Law Firm Merger Numbers Drop as Pandemic Takes Hold
Second-quarter numbers are likely to plummet further, according to Altman Weil and Fairfax Associates.
April 01, 2020 at 06:05 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The COVID-19 pandemic is putting law firm merger activity on ice, according to two consultancies that track such deals.
The effects of the international outbreak of the coronavirus can be seen in the first-quarter data collected by Altman Weil. The consultancy tracked only 17 U.S. law firm merger announcements during the first quarter, a 37% drop from Q1 2019.
Eleven of those merger announcements came in January; at that point, reported virus cases were mostly confined to China. Merger announcement activity had slowed by the end of February, and in March, the only law firm combination announced was the tie-up of two small New York firms.
"These are lawyers. Lawyers are not inclined to make risky moves in an uncertain environment," said Altman Weil principal Eric Seeger.
Fairfax Associates—which measures finalized mergers rather than newly announced deals—tracked 21 completed mergers last quarter. That's lower than the 25 deals that were inked in Q1 2019, but it's higher than Fairfax's 10-year average for the first quarter.
Many of the mergers were likely reached long before the coronavirus gripped the country's attention. "Q1 is not going to be a strong indicator of what's going to happen in the next couple of quarters," said Fairfax Associates principal Lisa Smith.
Both Seeger and Smith separately said they expect lower second-quarter merger numbers. The pandemic has already affected at least one previously announced merger—Troutman Sanders and Pepper Hamilton announced in March that they were postponing their merger by three months, from April 1 to July 1.
Altman Weil and Fairfax Associates said law firms are still interested in merging and combining with others, but the coronavirus has put a dampener on that activity. For one, law firm mergers require an element of face-to-face contact and in-person meetings; like other industries, Big Law has transitioned to remote work in an effort to stop the virus from spreading and infecting others.
But the pandemic's economic fallout means that law firm leaders are preoccupied with how their own business is doing. Some firms have already begun to lay off staff, pause partner draws and cut staff salaries in response to the pandemic.
That atmosphere means law firms are unlikely to acquire smaller firms and groups or bring on lateral partners, both Smith and Seeger said. However, they noted that, at this point, law firms are adding lateral partners who were well into the hiring process before the pandemic's effects began bearing down on law firms in late March.
"It doesn't look good when you're laying people off over here and you're adding people over there," Seeger said. "Acquisitions require management attention that just isn't available right now."
Despite the cuts law firms are making in response to the pandemic, it also creates buying and acquisition opportunities as well, Smith said. It also might expose how precarious a firm's financial health might be in an economic downturn, she added.
"In a few months, we might see some firms that are in need of saving," Smith said.
|Read More
'Survival Mode' Is Now for Some Law Firms, While Others Plan and Wait
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readThe Path in the Multiverse: Rethinking Client Engagement Through Gamification
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250