'Strong, Big-Name Firms' Are Looking at Imminent Cuts to Partner Draws, Consultant Says
To deal with economic uncertainty, industry adviser Kent Zimmermann said Am Law 100 firms are seriously considering numerous meaningful cost-cutting options.
April 01, 2020 at 01:43 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Cutting partner draws by as much as 50% in the near future is one option Am Law 100 firm leaders are considering to ensure the financial viability of their firms as the new coronavirus, and the stay-home orders intended to help slow its spread, continue to affect the economy.
Kent Zimmermann, a consultant at Zeughauser Group, said he spoke with the chairs of multiple Am Law 100 firms on Tuesday who said they are "close" to cutting partner draws within the next 30 days by as much as 50%, depending on their firm's revenue forecast for the next few months. He said some firms are predicting a modest revenue decline over the next few months, while others are looking at a drop-off in the 50% range, he said.
"These are strong, name-brand firms," he said.
Temporarily reducing the money going to equity partners is just one action law firm chairs and managing partners are considering right now while economic conditions are uncertain, Zimmermann said. Other options are deferring 2019 distributions that haven't been paid yet; reducing lawyer and staff head count; instituting mandatory reduced workweeks paired with a proportional compensation decrease; mandatory or temporary leaves of absence; and delaying or shortening summer associate programs.
Zimmermann said something that doesn't get a lot of attention during the good times is that the profit margins of Am Law 200 firms vary widely, from more than 50% among the most profitable firms down to 20% or less. "That causes a big difference in how much money you have to work with, or how much room you have to maneuver, when revenue may be down materially," he said.
While a number of large and midsize firms have already made decisions to lay off employees, cut pay or reduce partner draws, Zimmermann said firms really don't want to lead the industry in these unpopular actions for fear it's a sign of weakness.
But firm leaders are eager to talk to others about options and what they all face in these uncertain times, he said, noting that 45 or 50 Am Law 100 chairs and managing partners participated in a virtual meeting on Friday organized by Zeughauser Group.
Discussions during that chat were off-the-record, Zimmermann said, but based on individual conversations he's had with firm leaders, a lot of options are on the table.
Many firms are still collecting on pre-COVID-19 work, lawyers remain busy with work in progress, and some firms are "closing out March and like what they see," he noted. But, Zimmermann said, "There is concern at many well-run firms that they shouldn't get lulled into a false sense of security, because April, May, June may be worse."
He said the timeline for action varies, and some firms are simply having more open discussions with employees about what may be in the works.
"Some firms have been extremely transparent in telling both the attorneys and the staff that the options are on the table," he said, noting that those firms typically have a history of transparency. But other firms are wary of making statements to lawyers and employees before decisions are made because they want to keep their options open, he said.
The list of Am Law 200 firms whose cost-cutting actions have become public grew on Wednesday with Baker Donelson, which has cut partner draws and plans to temporarily reduce salaries and furlough some employees. Others taking action include Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, Reed Smith, Womble Bond Dickinson, and Goldberg Segalla, and some midsize firms.
As for hiring in the near term, Zimmermann said firms are realizing it's not "business as usual" but they face a decision in what to do about summer associate programs.
"The prevailing [question] is whether we delay the start of our summer program, or we just have a two-week boot camp at summer's end … or we just cancel," Zimmermann said.
Zimmermann said his advice to firms is to let associates know that even if the summer program is changed, they will still be hiring for the next fall. During the 2008-09 recession, some firms did not do that, and it may have affected their reputation at some law schools, he said.
Read More
Cadwalader Halts Partner Pay, Cuts Associate and Staff Compensation
Reed Smith Will 'Slow' Partner Pay in Response to COVID-19 Pressures
Womble Lays Off Some Employees, Cuts Lawyer and Staff Pay Amid Pandemic
'Survival Mode' Is Now for Some Law Firms, While Others Plan and Wait
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250