Florida-Based Firm Files Class Action Against Marriott After Latest Data Breach Revelation
The new case was filed in the wake of Marriott's announcement Tuesday that it had been the victim of another data intrusion, one that could affect as many as 5.2 million people.
April 02, 2020 at 04:12 PM
3 minute read
The Orlando, Florida-based personal injury firm Morgan & Morgan has sued Marriott International in federal court one day after the hotel chain announced it had been the victim of another data breach affecting millions of customers.
On Wednesday, attorneys with Morgan & Morgan filed a proposed class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The suit, Springmeyer v. Marriott International, listed Las Vegas resident Pati Springmeyer as class representative, and alleges the company failed to take required steps to protect its customers' data.
"These large companies know the risk posed by cyber criminals and continue to be cavalier with their customers' personal information. It's stunning that Marriott, which is already defending a significant data breach, we allege, would not have taken more care to secure its customers' information," attorneys John Morgan and John Yanchunis said in a statement about the suit. "The fact that this breach comes less than two years after the first one we know about is damning, and they must be held accountable."
The new case was filed in the wake of Marriott's announcement Tuesday that it had been the victim of another data intrusion, one that could affect as many as 5.2 million people. The breach, according to Marriott, was discovered at the end of February, after learning that the login credentials of two employees had been compromised. The company said it believes the intrusion began in mid-January.
In its announcement, the company said personal identification information, including people's names, mailing addresses, email addresses, birth dates and phone numbers, were likely exposed, as well as information for their loyalty accounts with the hotel and some airlines.
The news comes less than 18 months after the company announced it had been subject to an even wider data breach. In November 2018, the company announced that the personal data of 500 million guests of its Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide properties had been compromised. Marriott has since lowered that figure to fewer than 383 million, but the information that was potentially exposed in that breach included passport numbers and credit card information—both of which Marriott said were not likely to have been exposed in the latest breach.
Dozens of lawsuits were filed in the wake of the initial breach, which has been litigated out of federal court in Maryland, where the international hotel chain is headquartered.
In her 34-page complaint over the recent breach, Springmeyer contended that the hotel chain failed to take required steps to safeguard customer information, and should have been well aware of its responsibilities, given the prior breach.
"Marriott made significant expenditures to market its hotels and hospitality services, but neglected to adequately invest in data security, despite the growing number of data intrusions and several years of well-publicized data breaches, including its own massive breach a little over a year ago," the complaint said.
Springmeyer said that, since the breach, she has been monitoring her accounts for any misuse of her information.
The suit alleges negligence, breaches of contract and confidence, and violation of Maryland's Consumer Protection Act.
A spokeswoman for Marriott did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
READ THE COMPLAINT:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
NYC’s Oldest Deli Agrees to Update Bathrooms, Entrances to End ADA Charges
4 minute readJudge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1BOI Reports: What Business Owners and Attorneys Should Know
- 2SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 3Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 4The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 5Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250