New Study Finds Associates Like Their Partners, but Not Vice Versa
A survey of nearly 1,400 partners and more than 1,000 associates at regional, national and elite law firms reveals that most partners don't think that their associates work as hard as they did at that stage of their careers, and many partners think today's associates are not as good at their jobs and are less committed to their work.
April 02, 2020 at 01:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Today's law firm associates have generally positive things to say about the partners they work for. Unfortunately, that admiration isn't reciprocal.
A new, large-scale survey reveals that most partners don't think that their associates work as hard as they did at that stage of their careers, and many partners think today's associates are not as good at their jobs and are less committed to their work.
The report, titled "Multiple Generations In Law Firms: Working Together," is a collaboration between the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) and law firm consulting firm PP&C. Researchers gathered survey responses from nearly 1,400 partners and more than 1,000 associates at regional, national and elite law firms in 2019 in a bid to better understand the generational dynamics at play in those workplaces.
Among the major findings is that law firm partners have remarkably similar views about their work, whether they are baby boomers soon to retire or millennials who have only recently joined the partnership ranks. Millennial partners are more likely to work from home, and they tend to have somewhat higher opinions of associates than their older colleagues. But partners across generations are remarkably similar when it comes to being committed to and satisfied with their work.
"The oldest members of the millennial generation have become partners at major U.S. law firms," the report reads. "It turns out that these new partners share most of the attitudes and habits of the partners they are replacing or joining."
The report also offers an in-depth look at how associates feel about their jobs and their career aspirations. In general, they like the partners at their firm. Only 9% of the associate respondents listed partners when asked what they dislike about their firms, and 45% listed partners among the top four responses when asked what they most like.
Yet a large percentage of associates don't aspire to join the partner ranks. Fully 59% of the respondents said they don't want to become partners at their current firm, while 41% said they do. First-year associates were the least likely to report wanting to be partner, and that percentage steadily increased through the ranks of senior associates.
"I suspected that it was a minority of associates who were in for the long run and were prepared to make the sacrifices, work hard, and love it enough to compete for partnership," said Aric Press, a partner at PP&C and co-author of the report. "But I was surprised that is was 59% saying, 'No, I don't aspire to that.' And the numbers were particularly low in New York and at the economic elite firms. Which, when I thought about it, was probably not that surprising given that those are the most intense places." (Press is former editor-in-chief of Law.com affiliate The American Lawyer.)
The report suggests that law firms find opportunities to retain those associates who don't want to pursue the partnership track.
"This may be an opportune moment to seriously consider structures that allow firms to focus more development effort on those interested in partnership, while providing alternative career paths within the firm for talented, valuable lawyers who don't wish for the partnership life," the report reads.
A smaller percentage of women than men said they want to be partner—they comprised 46% of that group. Latinx associates also reported a higher percentage of partner aspirations than any other group, followed by black associates, at 60% and 46%, respectively, compared to 42% among white associates.
"The most surprising finding to me, and certainly among the most important findings, is the finding that black and Latinx associates are more likely than white associates to aspire to become partners at their current firms," said NALP executive director James Leipold.
The report also looked at how happy—or not—lawyers of different generations and at different stages in their career report to be. Baby boomers reported the highest levels of happiness among partners, while Generation X partners reported the lowest. That result may well come from the fact that baby boomers are nearing retirement, while many of the nuts and bolts of running a firm now fall on Gen Xers, the report notes. Overall, associates were the least happy group, with women associates reporting the lowest happiness rates.
The report also highlights some interesting findings on how partners view associates. Just 56% of the surveyed partners said today's associates are as good as they are, and that figure was just 29% among Gen X partners. Among all partners, 40% said associates expect too much of their law firms, and 37% said associates put their own needs and interests ahead of their firm and clients.
"To review, a substantial percentage of partners appear to be disappointed in their associates," the report reads. "A majority don't think today's young lawyers work as hard as they did. A substantial minority think young lawyers are not as skilled as they were. And about a third find their associates selfish."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation
5 minute readReturn to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals
1 minute readJustified Termination Does Not Bar Associate Attorney From Unemployment Benefits, State Appellate Court Rules
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Exceptional Growth Becoming the Rule? Demand and Rate Hikes Drove Strong Year for Big Law
- 2Dentons Taps D.C. Capital Markets Attorney for New US Managing Partner
- 3Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales
- 4German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
- 5Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250