NRA, Arguing Gun Shops Are 'Essential,' Sues New York Over Cuomo's COVID-19 Executive Order
The federal lawsuit comes nearly two weeks after Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued sweeping orders that mandated "nonessential" workers stay home.
April 03, 2020 at 12:32 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The National Rifle Association mounted a legal challenge against New York's coronavirus restrictions on Thursday, arguing the mandates are unconstitutionally vague and have required the closing of gun stores.
The federal lawsuit comes nearly two weeks after Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued sweeping orders that mandated "nonessential" workers stay home, a move that forced many businesses to close statewide and wreaked financial havoc on certain industries.
The executive order carved out an exception for essential workers and guidance from the state government classified a range of businesses under that definition.
The guidance did not explicitly list firearm and ammunition retailers as essential and officials interpreting the executive order have required "the closure of substantially all retailers of firearms and ammunition," according to the lawsuit.
It argues the executive order is overbroad and the closures are a pretextual attack on New Yorkers' Second Amendment rights.
"By closing federally licensed dealers, Defendants have cut off the only way of legally purchasing firearms in the State," the lawsuit argues. "As a result of the government's overreach, most New Yorkers have no legal way to exercise the constitutional right to purchase arms or ammunition."
New York Attorney General Letitia James issued a statement saying everyone must follow the law and all New York executive orders.
"We will aggressively defend the state against yet another legal assault by the NRA," she said in a statement.
The lawsuit is perhaps the most publicized challenge to Cuomo's sweeping order requiring nonessential workers to stay home. The order is aimed at limiting in-person interactions that can spread of the coronavirus, which state officials say has infected more than 92,300 people statewide and led to upward of 2,300 deaths.
New York remains the epicenter of the nation's coronavirus as the state marches closer to the virus' expected peak.
In the past, New York's three-term governor has highlighted that his efforts to control the spread of the disease have come without wide legal trouble.
Empire State Development, which issued the guidance on what would be classified as essential business, is listed as a defendant in the federal lawsuit, along with Cuomo.
The guidance from ESD listed a broad array of companies as essential, including grocery stores, laundromats and shipping services. The NRA lawsuit says sales of pizza, liquor and donuts have also been classified as "essential" by state officials.
"Yet, in the face of contrary federal guidance and ample constitutional authority, Governor Cuomo refuses to extend the same dispensation to firearm retailers," the lawsuit states.
The litigation points to a list of critical infrastructure from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The list included workers supporting "firearm or ammunition product manufacturers, retailers, importers, distributors, and shooting ranges."
According to the lawsuit, other states with coronavirus restrictions have signaled that gun stores can stay open.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readFederal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readCounty Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 2Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
- 3Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
- 4Deal Watch: What Dealmakers Are Thankful for in 2024
- 5'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250