2 Fall Bar Exam Dates Set, SCOTUS Arguments Nixed, Zoom Time: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
April 06, 2020 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
OPTIONS - While many states have yet to decide whether to cancel the July bar exam, the National Conference of Bar Examiners has announced two dates in the fall when law grads can take the test. Karen Sloan reports that the conference will offer an exam Sept. 9 and 10, and a second exam Sept. 30 and Oct. 1. New York became the first state to officially postpone the July bar, and Massachusetts, Connecticut and Hawaii have followed suit. California has not made a decision. The various exam dates mean the conference will need to develop different tests for each testing session.
DELAYED – SCOTUS has postponed, to a date uncertain, its two-week April oral argument session scheduled to begin April 20. Marcia Coyle reports that the justices have been reluctant to adopt the technology that has enabled other courts at the state and federal level to continue to hold hearings and arguments. The justices had a number of closely watched cases teed up for April, including Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, a First Amendment challenge involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, a federal law that has triggered much litigation around the country.
FAST MOVER – Zoom has accelerated into the spotlight as the go-to video-conferencing service while lawyers work remotely amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In this week's Legal Speak podcast, Zoom's top lawyer Aparna Bawa talks about supporting Zoom through its sudden growth spurt and, as she acknowledges, the growing pains that have emerged for the Bay Area firm.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
As US Unemployment Soars, Legal Industry Hopes to Avoid Widespread Layoffs
How the Pandemic Will Impact the Trump-Backed Lawsuit Against the Affordable Care Act
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
AILING – Mayer Brown has confirmed that three lawyers in its Hong Kong office have tested positive for COVID-19. As Anna Zhang reports, the news follows Mayer Brown's recent reversal of its policy requiring lawyers and staff to work in the office after receiving an anonymous letter from Hong Kong employees highly critical of the directive.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Screen-time restrictions are fairly out the window at this point."
— Jena Valdetero, partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, on working from home as the co-leader of the firm's data privacy and security team alongside her 5-year-old and a 7-year-old.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250