Cybersecurity Taking Back Seat to Coronavirus Damage Control for GCs
In a Morrison & Foerster survey on COVID-19 response, less than 30% of in-house leaders cited data security or privacy as major risks.
April 06, 2020 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Amid the COVID-19 pandemic and heightened concerns about employment issues, contracts and broken supply chains, it appears that general counsels are paying less attention to cybersecurity.
Only 29% of the 110 in-house leaders at global companies who participated in Morrison & Foerster's survey examining the business impacts of the coronavirus outbreak cited data security as being a major risk, while just 18% said privacy was among their top priorities.
"That wasn't a surprise because there's so much going on that's front of mind. But it's definitely something that we try to highlight for clients as a risk," David Newman, a partner at MoFo in Washington, D.C., said in an interview Friday. He heads the firm's coronavirus task force of more than 60 lawyers.
"As difficult as things are now, it will be even more challenging if they have a major data breach," Newman added.
Of all the legal risks that in-house leaders are facing in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak, none are more important than employment and human resources issues, according to the report. The survey took place between March 20 and March 24 and involved firms in a wide range of industries, including finance and insurance, technology and manufacturing.
More than 85% of the participating GCs listed labor law issues as their top legal risk, followed by contract-related issues and supply chain disruptions.
"Although it feels like we are in uncharted territory with regard to employees, the good news is there are some well-established legal principles in employment law that offer guidance on how to approach this issue," Janie Schulman, a Los Angeles-based MoFo partner who specializes in employment and labor law, said in a statement.
"Among others, one very important guiding principle for employers to consider in this unprecedented situation is the need to be flexible," she added. "Employees have long memories and they will remember how you treated them on this occasion and it will likely have an impact on their loyalty and their morale."
Corporate counsel are always busy. But now they're juggling more than ever, from poring over contracts and analyzing force majeure provisions to deciphering leave and sick pay policies and considering murky employer guidelines for potential layoffs, all while trying to make corporate law departments function with remote employees.
Nearly 65% of the survey respondents said their biggest challenge at the moment was being asked to provide advice on unprecedented issues. The second-biggest challenge? About 55% said it was "making decisions in an uncertain environment."
"It's almost impossible in these times for companies to be fully in accord with their contracts, their privacy obligations, their labor law obligations," Newman said.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readIn Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
6 minute readGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250