How Will COVID-19 Disrupt Law School Admissions?
The ongoing crisis is presenting some turmoil during the admissions cycle, at least in the short-term, as schools scramble to connect remotely with prospective 1Ls and accepted applicants.
April 07, 2020 at 04:51 PM
5 minute read
|
The law school admissions cycle is heading into a critical period when deposits for applicants to save a seat are due and prospective students must make decisions about where to attend—or whether to attend at all.
It's too early to tell exactly how COVID-19 will affect admission numbers, and it's also uncertain how it will impact the number of international students coming to U.S. law schools, which has become an increasingly important source of students and tuition over the past decade.
But it is clear that the ongoing crisis is creating some turmoil with admissions, at least in the short-term, as schools scramble to connect remotely with prospective 1Ls and accepted applicants.
The total number of applicants to American Bar Association-accredited law schools was down nearly 4% as of April 6, compared with the previous year. Just 16 law schools have seen an increase in applications, while 180 have seen a decrease. And the cancellation of the March and April LSATs could impede a late surge in applications for fall admission, though the introduction of a pared down, at-home version of the test in May will give procrastinators the chance to apply this cycle.
Uncertainty about what lies ahead prompted hundreds of potential law school students to attend an informational webinar in late March hosted by Law School Admission Council president Kellye Testy, featuring law deans and admissions deans discussing the current situation. (A second online session is scheduled for Wednesday.) Among their most frequent questions were what will happen with the April LSAT; how will law schools view pass/fail grades for the spring semester; and whether admissions decisions will be slower this year.
Testy and the panelists, which included University of Minnesota Law School Dean Garry Jenkins and University of Oregon School of Law Dean Marcilynn Burke, sought to reassure applicants that the council and law schools will be flexible this cycle and work with them to ensure that everyone who wished to apply for fall admission is able to do so. They also said that pass/fail grades for the current semester won't hinder applicants, especially given that most law schools have also adopted pass/fail grading schemes. Letters of recommendation may take on some added weight in the absence of normal grades, they noted. They suggested that applicants keep in close contact with admissions offices.
"We will, together, make sure you get through this," Testy told the attendees.
Concerned that the pandemic will drag on, law school administrators are already contemplating how they would bring new students on in the fall virtually, if campuses are unable to reopen by then.
But there may be a partial silver lining for law schools. Steve Schwartz, CEO of test prep provider LSAT Unplugged, said getting a juris doctor may be an attractive option for college seniors, given that the pandemic seems to have dealt a significant blow to the entry-level hiring market. The opportunity cost of law school is lower this year given the newly limited job opportunities, he said.
"Those graduating from undergrad now face a job market where few are hiring—if they have few employment options in the short-term, law school becomes relatively more appealing," he said. "This would be similar to what we saw in the 2008-2010 recession where law school applications spiked—because the job market was unappealing, applicants chose to enter law school to 'wait it out' and hope the job market would improve in the next three years."
Schwartz polled his LSAT students about whether they would still attend in the fall if law school classes were held online, and the majority responded that they would. But some students would likely defer admissions if the new academic year remained disrupted by the coronavirus.
That lack of certainty may well skew the models law schools use to determine how many applicants to accept in order to assemble the ideal class. A surge of deferrals will likely mean more admission offers off of waitlists. Applicants might want to stay closer to home this cycle given the pandemic. Some applicants may be more desperate to get in given the swift economic downturn, while law schools might be extra generous with scholarships if their applicant pools are smaller than normal, Schwartz said.
The cancellation of the March LSAT has already prompted at least one law school to begin accepting the GRE alongside the law-specific admission exam. Willamette University College of Law announced Monday that it will immediately begin accepting GRE scores from applicants—joining the 53 other ABA campuses that have started taking GRE scores since 2016. Educational Testing Service, which administers the GRE, announced last month that the exam can be taken at home amid the pandemic. The Law School Admission Council has said it is looking at the possibility of administering the LSAT remotely as well but has not announced any specifics.
"We are committed to continuing to expand access to education while attracting a diverse student body with a wide range of experiences and backgrounds," said Willamette Law Dean Curtis Bridgeman. "We also hope to create flexible options for our prospective students during this period of uncertainty."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
- 2'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
- 3Questions About Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Remain Unanswered
- 4Santa Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
- 5Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250