Firm Downsizing Likely Won't Fuel Talent Migration to Legal Tech, ALSPs
A large job migration within the legal ecosystem is unlikely to materialize as many legal tech companies and ALSPs aren't in a position to boost hiring.
April 08, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
The legal industry is still adapting to the impact levied by the outbreak of COVID-19. But many organizations, including law firms, have already taken steps to try and soften the economic blow. Firms such as Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle have already cut associate salaries by 25%, while others such as Clayton Utz have instituted hiring freezes, or—in the case of Cullen & Dykman—begun the process of laying off and furloughing attorneys.
For out-of-work law firm attorneys, legal tech companies and alternative legal service providers can potentially serve as other sources of employment. But don't count on seeing a massive redistribution of human resources within the legal ecosystem any time soon.
Kimball Parker, CEO of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's tech subsidiary SixFifty, posited that law firms are more prepared now than they were for the recession in 2008, which may put some of the large-scale firms in a stronger position than others in the legal field to absorb the fallout from the novel coronavirus.
"[The workforce] could be redistributed back into firms just as easily as away from firms. … I could easily foresee a situation where firms fare better than legal technology companies," Parker said.
It's not that there's a lack of utility for attorneys working inside legal technology companies. Having lawyers on staff can provide legal tech companies with immediate feedback from the audience who will eventually be using their products.
"I think it's one of the reasons we see attorneys either getting hired [by] or starting legal tech companies, because they have some of the insights already in their head and no other attorney is slowing down to help anybody else see the problem," Andrew Whelan, vice president and law firm segment leader for CT Corp. at Wolters Kluwer, told LTN last year.
However, the economic impact wrought by COVID-19 might leave legal tech companies in no position to make those hires. Legal professionals are continuing to leverage technology such as remote conferencing software or knowledge management platforms to help keep business flowing, which may be helping to shift lawyers' overall attitude toward tech adoption in a more positive direction. But law firm and corporate belt tightening could still hit legal tech hard, with some companies already taking precautions.
On Wednesday, Bloomberg Law reported that Elevate was enacting 10% salary cuts across-the-board, while legal app-store Reynen Court's senior executive team will be taking 20% salary cuts and instituting a freeze on new hiring.
"In the short term, I think [COVID-19] is going to have a pretty devastating effect on the industry," Parker said.
There may be a few exceptions in such niches as legal research, where smaller companies may benefit from firms beginning to turn away from larger, more expensive legacy competitors. E-discovery could also have some spots available for job-seeking attorneys. Parker indicated that during the recession of 2008, many attorneys found work performing document review.
What's more, ALSPs could potentially offer a similar employment outlet for lawyers having trouble finding work.
Alternative legal services provider Axiom is continuing to hiring attorneys, with senior vice president of lawyer talent John Erban noting a slight bump in applications from earlier in the year. Erban thinks that even beyond COVID-19, in-house legal departments will have to reconsider how they restructure their legal teams, potentially relying on outside law company assistance should internal head count dwindle.
Where the work goes, so could the lawyers. "You're going to see more people continue to come to Axiom to be employed, and you are going to see more demand for places like Axiom as the result of legal departments doing what we're talking about," Erban said.
However, that may not be the case for every ALSP out there. Zach Abramowitz, a consultant in the legal technology space, pointed out that not all ALSPs are staffing companies such as Axiom and may not be looking to hire attorneys. It's also worth noting that these law companies could also be feeling the economic impact of COVID-19.
"Not all ALSPs are necessarily recession-proof. Will companies that took private equity funding in the last five years and have already been consolidating and 'eliminating redundancies' be in a position to hire? That is not clear. The private equity funds may already be looking for liquidity opportunities," Abramowitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
7 minute readThe Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek
4 minute readFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute readHouston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 2Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 3'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 4Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
- 5DOJ's Flawed Thinking in Challenging HPE-Juniper Merger
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250