Six Flags Hit With Class Actions Seeking Refunds Due to COVID-19
Two class actions allege Six Flags continued to automatically charge monthly and season pass holders despite closing its amusement parks through mid-May due to the coronavirus.
April 14, 2020 at 03:03 PM
3 minute read
Two class actions allege Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. has continued to automatically charge monthly and season pass holders despite closing its amusement parks through mid-May due to COVID-19.
Both lawsuits, filed on Friday and Monday in the Central District of California federal court, allege that Six Flags used credit and debit card information to charge customers soon after announcing on March 13 that its parks had closed.
"Six Flags has made the unconscionable decision to keep charging its hundreds of thousands of membership and season pass holders monthly membership fees while closing 100 percent of its theme parks as the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, rages throughout the world and the United States economy has gone into a deep recession," says Monday's complaint, filed by Bursor & Fisher's Yeremey Krivoshey, on behalf of Francis Ruiz, a Los Angeles resident who claims Six Flags charged him $9.95 a month on March 30 and denied him a full refund. "Thus, defendants have made the deliberate decision to bilk their customers on a monthly basis as the country is effectively shut down."
Krivoshey and a representative of Six Flags, based in Grand Prairie, Texas, did not respond to a request for comment.
San Diego's Khashayar Law Group filed Friday's complaint on behalf of Shahriyar Rezai-Hariri, who alleges Six Flags charged a $6.95 monthly fee on March 25.
Six Flags has 26 theme parks, 23 of which are in the United States, including California and Texas. Monthly pass holders pay $7.85 to $42 per month, while season membership ranges from $240 to $505, according to Monday's complaint. The lawsuit claims Six Flags has continued to charge full costs or refused to reimburse prepaid customers for the time they haven't been able to use the park, offering instead the choice of extending passes.
Both lawsuits claim violations of California consumer fraud laws, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and unjust enrichment, among other things.
The lawsuits are the latest to seek refunds for consumers in the wake of the coronavirus closures, with others filed against universities, gyms and airlines. Bursor & Fisher, based in Walnut Creek, California, filed another consumer fraud class action on March 27 alleging that 24-Hour Fitness USA Inc. has continued to charge monthly membership fees to millions of its customers' credit and debit cards even though it closed its 430 gyms across the country March 16.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAttorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic to Law Requiring Porn Sites to Verify Users' Age
- 2Cybersecurity Breaches, Cyberbullying, and Ways to Help Protect Clients From Both
- 3AI in 2025: Five Key Predictions on How It Will Reshape International Law Firms
- 4Justice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
- 5Robinson & Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250