Crowell Cuts Pay, Citing COVID-19 Projections, Aiming to Avoid Layoffs
Philip Inglima, the firm's chair, said equity partners will take a temporary 25% compensation cut, nonequity partners will take a 20% cut, and associates and counsel will take a 15% cut and staff making more than $100,000 will also have their pay reduced.
April 15, 2020 at 01:35 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Crowell & Moring, an Am Law 100 firm known for its major government contracts practice, said Wednesday it will cut pay for lawyers and some professional staff by 5% to 25% in response to the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the economy.
Philip Inglima, the firm's chair, said equity partners will take a 25% compensation cut, income partners will take a 20% cut, and associates and counsel will take a 15% cut. Staff making more than $100,000—about a third of the firm's staff—also will have their pay reduced 5% to 20%, he said. He said the reductions were temporary and the firm expects to lift them by the end of the year, depending on the impact of the pandemic.
Inglima added that because partners benefit most when times are good, they are "shouldering the main burdens of our response." He said the firm was fortunate that clients had turned to it for help in the crisis, with some proving to be "fairly resistant" to its effects.
"We have avoided any approach that would include layoffs," he said, noting that the firm has also cut back on expenses and planned capital outlays. "Instead, we are focused on trying to ensure that we have reductions in the real-time cost of our talent over the next several months."
Inglima said the firm has been supporting clients working on the coronavirus response, including major industrial clients that are working on ventilators and other medical supplies hospitals need. Many coronavirus patients who are hospitalized have been put on ventilators, raising fears of a shortage of the devices and of the drugs required to keep the critically ill patients using them safe and sedated.
In terms of law firm business, Inglima said, Crowell anticipates that its recovery cases, many of which are done on contingency, will still do well this year. But, he cautioned, it is impossible for any firm to say it was "insulated" from the pandemic's impact, noting, for example, that "our clients' timeliness of payment and ability to continue sending us work through the balance of the year are going to be affected by it."
"We did see some of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on our clients and on our revenue in March, but fairly modest," he said. "It's much more an expectation of what it will do for the balance of the year."
News of the compensation cuts comes shortly after the firm announced it was expanding in San Francisco with the hire of several partners and other lawyers from Atrium, the legal startup that closed its doors earlier this year. Inglima said the firm already had some visibility into the impact of the pandemic when the hires were made, and said it would continue to make hires "on a very selective basis."
|Read More
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250