System Overload: Lagging Internet May Be Inconvenient Mainstay for Attorneys
Lawyers battling for fast internet speed as everyone works from home are rarely victorious. Law firm chief information officers say it's a burden many are going to have to live with.
April 16, 2020 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
As more lawyers and legal staff work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, many are having to deal with the intermittent freezing and lagging of firm-provided software. But law firm chief information officers (CIOs) say the problem stems from bogged-down internet service providers (ISP), which is a function that's out of their hands.
Duane Morris CIO John Sroka said his firm's transition from averaging roughly 250 attorneys working remotely to nearly 1,200 was a fairly smooth shift. Purchasing additional software and providing training was enough to prepare the firm, he noted. However, Sroka did hear concerns from staffers and attorneys that home internet connections weren't up to par for their workloads.
"The only time there were issues, and this was early on, was when the internet providers were being really bogged down," Sroka said.
Of course, the legal industry is not alone in its sudden shift to remote working in light of local governments' enforcing social distancing protocols. But Kelley Drye & Warren chief information officer Judith Flournoy said that lawyers aren't only competing with their neighbors for internet speeds. She noted that many staffers and lawyers are working from home alongside their spouses and children who were also uprooted from their classrooms to video conference-based learning.
"There's a little bit of contention over the availability of bandwidth," she said. "They are on the same network; the ISPs [internet service providers] didn't necessarily have a scale-up plan for an event like this."
For Perkins Coie chief information officer Rick Howell, who got the 1,100 attorney firm working remotely in 10 days, he's seen slow internet complaints mostly from attorneys and staffers who work in densely populated areas.
To combat congested internet, the firm provides bandwidth test tools to its data center and staff to determine where the problem is occurring, Howell said. If it's a local disruption, the firm provides the staffer or lawyer with a mobile WiFi (MiFi) hot spot. When there's trouble moving large files, the firm will connect the user to a virtual desktop infrastructure, so the traffic stays in Perkins Coie's data center, he added.
To be sure, legal industry observers predicted that as more law firms switch to remotely working, slow internet speeds would impact productivity.
But McNees Wallace & Nurick chief information officer Stephen Sobotta said slower internet hasn't impacted the firm's productivity as it works remotely. Instead, staffers and lawyers have learned to work through it.
"The flexibility of our users has been such that they understand and accept those little minor inconveniences like the cursor moving a little slower because they know they have the ability to support clients on a daily basis and their systems will be operational and reliable," he said. "They may not just be 100% as they were in the office."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250