A Down Economy Could Have an Upside for (Some) Legal Tech Startups
Tech startups could benefit from law firms or legal departments seeking cheaper access to legal services in the face of COVID-19. But they aren't immune to an economic slowdown either.
April 17, 2020 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Startups in the legal tech or services market have traditionally had to go up against more robust legacy companies with an established toehold in law firms or legal departments. But the economic disruptions brought about by the spread of COVID-19 may be pushing firms and other consumers of legal services to consider pursuing less established—and in some cases less expensive—alternatives.
To be sure, startups are occupying the same legal tech market as legacy companies, a space that has already seen some collective belt tightening among both businesses and clients alike. Law firms are engaging in salary cuts, layoffs and furloughs, while legal tech providers like e-discovery company DISCO have also trimmed staff to "proactively address and reduce potential risk" in the face of COVID-19.
However, it's possible all of this wallet-watching could reap unintended benefits for legal startups as law firms and legal departments seek out cheaper alternatives to longstanding incumbents, or realign their needs in preparation for the arrival of a post-pandemic world. Legal research provider Fastcase, for example, has received more interest as of late from large-scale upmarket firms looking to make a change.
While CEO Ed Walters stated that the company had been trending up market prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, he also indicated that it can be difficult to tear law firms away from prestige or legacy incumbents in the space, which features heavy-hitters with recognizable names like Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis. "I think when times are good, it's hard for the Am Law 250 firms to buy something like Fastcase… No one ever got fired for buying IBM," Walters said.
But with firms being pushed to make tough decisions with regards to layoffs and salary cuts, name recognition may start to count for less. Per Walters, firms typically keep two legal research services in use so that neither provider can exert too much leverage or power in the relationship. He postulated that firms may be inclined to cut one of those legacy providers in search of lower-cost alternatives, a way of thinking that could remain in place even after the economy recovers. "I think it's a one-way ratchet. That there's no going back," Walters said.
Still, a COVID-19 economy may not offer a path to new business for all legal tech startups. Law firms, legal departments and other businesses operating in the legal sphere may be reluctant to set up new projects while the future remains so uncertain. But Zach Abramowitz, a consultant in the legal technology space, suggested tech companies that have done previous work with a client around solutions like contract extraction tools could find themselves called upon to help navigate pandemic related anxieties related to deal provisions or terms.
"How many companies are taking on new initiatives right now? Probably very few. But if you've already done some work with a technology company and you already have a working relationship there, that's probably an amazing opportunity for the tech company," Abramowitz said.
For instance Evisort, an AI-powered powered contract management platform, has changed its focus in the wake of COVID-19 to concentrate on existing customers. The move was in part a reaction to the obstacles facing new sales. Evisort co-founder and CEO Jerry Ting pointed out that with more offices working from home, it's difficult to reach perspective customers over the phone. The company was also weary of appearing tone-deaf in the midst of a global pandemic.
"It's like, 'Hey, our business is going through a hard time. Do you want to buy some contract management software?' We think that's not tasteful," Ting said.
Instead, the company is taking a more consultative approach to its services, reaching out to existing clients and offering to help them navigate problems related to contract issues like force majeure or locating alternative opportunities for cost cutting. "We're trying to lean into the [COVID-19] situation as much as we can," Ting said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Arizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250