'Like a War Zone': NY Nurses Union Sues Bronx Hospital, Claiming Failure to Protect Staff Battling COVID-19
The federal litigation against Montefiore Medical Center argues that nurses are treating sick patients with "inadequate" equipment, frequently in rooms that were not properly converted to handle a COVID-19 patient.
April 20, 2020 at 01:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The New York State Nurses Association launched a lawsuit against a Bronx hospital Monday, accusing the medical center of not doing enough to protect workers on the front line of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The federal litigation against Montefiore Medical Center argues that nurses are treating sick patients with "inadequate" equipment, frequently in rooms that were not properly converted to handle a COVID-19 patient.
The lawsuit further alleges that nurses are "often working while they are sick because they have been forced back to work too early" and "often in practice areas where they have never been trained."
The union is being represented by the firm Cohen, Weiss and Simon.
The coronavirus has raged through downstate New York, but state officials say there are signs that lockdown measures are waning the overall pressure on the state's hospital system. Hospitalization figures and the number of people intubated are trending downward, according to state numbers.
Despite those indicators, the lawsuit said nurses are still treating large numbers of "very sick and frightened patients."
"Montefiore has become a major center for treating COVID-19 and suspected COVID-19 patients," according to the lawsuit. "Right now, the hospital is like a war zone."
The hospital, according to the litigation, rejected the union's efforts to lessen the risks associated with the new coronavirus.
The lawsuit asks the court to issue a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to compel the hospital to provide a sufficient number of personal protective equipment, such as fitted N95 masks, clean face shields and non-permeable gowns.
Health care workers nationwide have raised concerns and issued warnings about not having enough personal protective equipment during the coronavirus outbreak.
The union, which represents about 42,000 frontline nurses, says about 72% of its members have been exposed to the coronavirus at work and at least eight registered nurses in the union have died due to contracting the virus at work.
The lawsuit said the hospital is requiring nurses to treat COVID-19 patients without providing them N95 respirators or requiring them to use the same N95 respirator for days while looking after numerous patients.
"The normal standard of care in the United States is that disposable N95 respirators must be discarded after each patient care session," the lawsuit states. The union argues that surgical masks are ineffective at protecting the nurses from the airborne particles and aerosolized droplets that come from patients with the virus.
The union also asked the court to compel the hospital to enforce the visitors policy and to provide a secure space to put on and take off personal protective equipment.
Montefiore Medical Center did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the litigation.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'That Decision was Wrong:' Federal Judge Rethinks Consumer Protection Class Certification
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Standing for Plaintiffs in Copyright Suit Over AI Training of ChatGPT
- 2LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 3NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 4ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 5'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250