Missouri Sues China for Billions of Dollars Lost to Coronavirus
Missouri's lawsuit, filed Tuesday, makes it the first state to sue Chinese governmental authorities for allegedly covering up knowledge of the coronavirus.
April 21, 2020 at 03:08 PM
4 minute read
The state of Missouri has sued the People's Republic of China for creating a public nuisance claiming the actions of its officials caused the global coronavirus pandemic.
In a lawsuit filed Tuesday, Attorney General Eric Schmitt said Chinese governmental authorities covered up knowledge of COVID-19 as early as December, including in reports to the World Health Organization, then hoarded personal protective equipment. The state of Missouri, where 5,800 people have confirmed cases of coronavirus and 177 have died from complications from an infection, seeks billions of dollars.
"The Chinese government lied to the world about the danger and contagious nature of COVID-19, silenced whistleblowers, and did little to stop the spread of the disease," said Schmitt in a statement Tuesday.
The suit, filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Missouri, is the latest case brought against the Chinese government over COVID-19. Last month, Matthew Moore, an attorney at the Berman Law Firm in Boca Raton, Florida, brought the first case as a class action. Robert Eglet, of Eglet Adams in Las Vegas, filed another class action soon afterward.
Missouri is the first state to sue China over COVID-19, which has caused about 40,000 deaths in the United States to date, and where roughly 750,000 people have contracted the coronavirus. The suit also names The Communist Party of China, other Chinese health and emergency departments, the People's Government of Hubei Province, and the People's Government of Wuhan City, where the first outbreak of coronavirus occurred.
Missouri seeks an abatement plan to fix the "enormous economic disruptions" caused by the coronavirus. Although the lawsuit names the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its administrator, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the allegations briefly touch on the idea that a scientific research laboratory unleashed the coronavirus. Instead, the claims primarily focus on the actions of government officials, including allegations about censorship, false statements and the arrest of eight whistleblowers who warned about the spread of the coronavirus. Those included a doctor who attempted to share information about the disease on WeChat, and another in Wuhan disciplined for telling staff to wear masks. As recently as April 17, China revised its official COVID-19 death toll in Wuhan by more than 1,000.
The suit also references articles in The New York Times about the Chinese government's decision to allow nearly 175,000 individuals in Wuhan to travel Jan. 1 for Lunar New Year.
"An appalling campaign of deceit, concealment, misfeasance and inaction by Chinese authorities unleashed this pandemic," the suit says. "During the critical weeks of the initial outbreak, Chinese authorities deceived the public, suppressed crucial information, arrested whistleblowers, denied human-to-human transmission in the face of mounting evidence, destroyed critical medical research, permitted millions of people to be exposed to the virus, and even hoarded personal protective equipment—thus causing a global pandemic that was unnecessary and preventable. Defendants are responsible for the enormous death, suffering and economic losses they inflicted on the world, including Missourians, and they should be held accountable."
In addition to public nuisance, for which the suit seeks civil damages, restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, the complaint cites Missouri tort law, which permits strict liability for "abnormally dangerous activities," as well as breaches of duty.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAttorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Settlements Totaled $40B+ Three Years in a Row: 'We’re in a New Era'
- 2Automaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
- 3MLB's Texas Rangers Search For a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
- 4Does the Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
- 5Gen AI Legal Tech Startup Eve Raises $47 Million Series A Investment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250