Missouri Sues China for Billions of Dollars Lost to Coronavirus
Missouri's lawsuit, filed Tuesday, makes it the first state to sue Chinese governmental authorities for allegedly covering up knowledge of the coronavirus.
April 21, 2020 at 03:08 PM
4 minute read
The state of Missouri has sued the People's Republic of China for creating a public nuisance claiming the actions of its officials caused the global coronavirus pandemic.
In a lawsuit filed Tuesday, Attorney General Eric Schmitt said Chinese governmental authorities covered up knowledge of COVID-19 as early as December, including in reports to the World Health Organization, then hoarded personal protective equipment. The state of Missouri, where 5,800 people have confirmed cases of coronavirus and 177 have died from complications from an infection, seeks billions of dollars.
"The Chinese government lied to the world about the danger and contagious nature of COVID-19, silenced whistleblowers, and did little to stop the spread of the disease," said Schmitt in a statement Tuesday.
The suit, filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Missouri, is the latest case brought against the Chinese government over COVID-19. Last month, Matthew Moore, an attorney at the Berman Law Firm in Boca Raton, Florida, brought the first case as a class action. Robert Eglet, of Eglet Adams in Las Vegas, filed another class action soon afterward.
Missouri is the first state to sue China over COVID-19, which has caused about 40,000 deaths in the United States to date, and where roughly 750,000 people have contracted the coronavirus. The suit also names The Communist Party of China, other Chinese health and emergency departments, the People's Government of Hubei Province, and the People's Government of Wuhan City, where the first outbreak of coronavirus occurred.
Missouri seeks an abatement plan to fix the "enormous economic disruptions" caused by the coronavirus. Although the lawsuit names the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its administrator, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the allegations briefly touch on the idea that a scientific research laboratory unleashed the coronavirus. Instead, the claims primarily focus on the actions of government officials, including allegations about censorship, false statements and the arrest of eight whistleblowers who warned about the spread of the coronavirus. Those included a doctor who attempted to share information about the disease on WeChat, and another in Wuhan disciplined for telling staff to wear masks. As recently as April 17, China revised its official COVID-19 death toll in Wuhan by more than 1,000.
The suit also references articles in The New York Times about the Chinese government's decision to allow nearly 175,000 individuals in Wuhan to travel Jan. 1 for Lunar New Year.
"An appalling campaign of deceit, concealment, misfeasance and inaction by Chinese authorities unleashed this pandemic," the suit says. "During the critical weeks of the initial outbreak, Chinese authorities deceived the public, suppressed crucial information, arrested whistleblowers, denied human-to-human transmission in the face of mounting evidence, destroyed critical medical research, permitted millions of people to be exposed to the virus, and even hoarded personal protective equipment—thus causing a global pandemic that was unnecessary and preventable. Defendants are responsible for the enormous death, suffering and economic losses they inflicted on the world, including Missourians, and they should be held accountable."
In addition to public nuisance, for which the suit seeks civil damages, restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, the complaint cites Missouri tort law, which permits strict liability for "abnormally dangerous activities," as well as breaches of duty.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readCounty Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute read'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250