Get Ready, Defense Attorneys: States Are Ramping Up Enforcement Against Price Gougers
Attorneys general are putting retailers on notice about potential lawsuits.
April 22, 2020 at 12:36 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Defense attorneys are likely to see an influx of new business in the coming weeks and months, as prosecutors target businesses accused of taking advantage of public fears by artificially escalating prices on COVID-19-related supplies.
"A lot of attorneys will be very busy defending retailers and people who are price gouging, no doubt," said Connecticut lawyer Mark Dubois, of Geragthy & Bonnano in New London. "The attorney general and his counterparts have some pretty strong tools in the consumer protection area, and they have the ability to conduct civil investigations that can be quite far-reaching."
Attorneys general across the country are mobilizing.
In Florida, businesses have returned more than $240,000 to consumers, who overpaid during the COVID-19 outbreak, according to news reports.
"We are responding in real-time to complaints of price gouging and scams, making sure we are getting price adjustments … getting refunds for Floridians," Attorney General Ashley Moody said in a statement. "We are also making sure we are furthering those investigations by issuing preservation letters and subpoenas. So that work will continue."
Meanwhile, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said his office had received 558 complaints concerning 313 retailers in the state. His staff has sent letters of inquiry to 255 of these businesses, which include online and brick-and-mortar stores.
In one instance, a retailer allegedly charged $33.47 for a 12 ounce, two-pack of Purell hand sanitizer, a 261% increase over the price about two months earlier in January. Another business allegedly charged $555 for a 40-pack of 3M N95 masks, representing a more than fivefold price increase.
Tong's office is considering, on a case-by-case basis, whether to file suit against those retailers.
"The state has subpoena power and investigatory powers and those can be quite intrusive," said Wiggin and Dana attorney Robert Langer, who specializes in antitrust law.
|3M-Related Actions
But are there any possible defenses for price gouging?
"I suppose there could be a whatever-the-market-can-bear defense," Dubois said Wednesday. "While you might have technical legal defenses, these cases end up being tried in the court of public opinion. People do not look kindly on those accused of price gouging."
Meanwhile, Tong's office issued a release announcing it had joined 20 other attorneys general urging The 3M Co. to take further measures to prevent price gouging of personal protective equipment.
The attorneys general are asking the company to take several actions, including creating a database of 3M's inventory of N95 respirators for government officials and health care providers, and to make transparent how inventory is being distributed, and how orders are being filed.
In addition to Connecticut, participating states include California, Delaware, New York and Pennsylvania.
And earlier in April, Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, according to Politico, introduced legislation that would ban online sellers from exploiting loopholes in price-gouging policies. That legislation is pending.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250