Super Rich Firms, GC's Gender Pay Gap, Mergers' Long Game: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
April 22, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
THE TOP 30 – In the legal market, the rich are getting richer. Patrick Smith reports that this year's list of super rich firms released by Law.com affiliate The American Lawyer shows just how much 30 firms drove the Am Law 100's growth in 2019. Super rich firms, for instance, saw their revenue grow almost three times as much as the rest of the Am Law 100 last year. This year's super rich list also included newcomer Fenwick & West, while previous participants Williams & Connolly and King & Spalding didn't make the cut.
TOO BIG TO PAY - Equal pay may be harder to come by in larger U.S. organizations. Phillip Bantz reports on a survey from Major, Lindsey & Africa that found that gender pay disparities in corporate legal departments tend to be higher in companies with greater revenues. Companies with over $10 billion in revenue, for example, had a gender pay gap of around 40% in favor of male GCs. One co-author of the survey was surprised by the results, but noted the discrepancies appear to be tied to bonuses instead of base salaries.
MERGER METRICS - Firms looking to stay afloat in a struggling economy take heed: Mergers aren't always a recipe for immediate success. Analyzing four Am Law 100 mergers over the past decade, Christine Simmons reports that many merged firms' revenue in their early years lagged behind or was flat when compared to the combined revenue the separate entities made before the merger. Still, most merged firms analyzed also increased their revenue per attorney, grew their client relationships, and made important lateral hires they believe wouldn't have been possible as a separate entity.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
New York Financial Regulator Sues Opioid Maker, Alleging It Downplayed Usage Risk
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
RÉSUMÉ RISKS – Partners should think twice the next time they receive a résumé. Hannah Roberts reports that recruiters in the UK are putting firms at risk by sending job applicants' résumés directly to firm partners—without the applicants' consent. Hosting personal data without expressed permission runs afoul of the GDPR, the EU's far reaching privacy law which still applies in the UK. To address these privacy risks, some firms are using software that requires applicants to grant permission to an HR department before accessing their résumé.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"We've always encouraged team members to pick up the phone, rather than invariably resort to email or instant messaging, but now it's even more important than ever to increase the frequency of voice or video contact and help diminish the sense of isolation."
— Peggy Giunta, chief legal personnel and professional development officer at WilmerHale, discussing how practice group leaders can promote a sense of community within the firm while staff is working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute read'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
5 minute readTikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
- 2Womble Bond Dickinson Adds New Leaders as Merger Is Completed
- 3Family's Disability Discrimination Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Six Flags
- 4Turning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
- 5Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250