Utah Becomes First State to Let Law Grads Skip Bar Exam Amid COVID-19
The Utah Supreme Court was inundated with comments from those who supported and opposed its proposed emergency diploma privilege and ultimately decided to move forward with the program, making it the first jurisdiction to let law grads skip the exam.
April 22, 2020 at 11:51 AM
5 minute read
Utah has officially become the first jurisdiction to allow aspiring lawyers to bypass the bar exam and become licensed amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Utah Supreme Court on Tuesday issued an order adopting an emergency diploma privilege for recent law graduates who meet a lengthy list of criteria, including that they complete 360 hours of legal work under the supervision of an experienced attorney licensed in the state. Qualifying law graduates will become full members of the Utah bar if they complete all the requirements by the end of 2020, without taking the bar exam. Utah has about 200 students from its two law schools graduating in May.
"I admire the courage, compassion and leadership of our justices," tweeted Brigham Young University law dean Gordon Smith after the order was issued. "Well done!"
The move demonstrates the enormous upheaval that the pandemic has created in legal education, as other jurisdictions grapple with how to deal with the nearly 40,000 law graduates entering the upended job market next month.
Graduating law students across the country have called on courts and bar exam authorities to embrace an emergency diploma privilege on the grounds that it's unclear when it will be feasible and safe to administer the bar exam, and that licensing delays will derail their ability to launch their careers. An emergency diploma privilege was one of the alternative approaches endorsed by a group of legal academics in March, who urged authorities to make swift decisions about the fate of the July bar in part to alleviate the anxiety of graduating law students. But the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which develops the test, this month cautioned jurisdictions that abandoning the bar exam would put the public at risk by opening the profession to unqualified lawyers.
Meanwhile, a growing number of jurisdictions have announced postponements or cancellations of the July bar exam, with many opting to reschedule the test in September—when the national conference is offering two alternative dates. Some jurisdictions, including New Jersey, Georgia and Arizona, are also extending supervised practice rules that will allow recent graduates to work under the watch of a licensed attorney while they await a chance to sit for the bar.
Utah's path to adopting an emergency diploma privilege highlights how passionate people feel about the bar exam—or about skipping it. The court circulated its proposed order on April 9, giving the public a week to submit comments. It received more than 500 comments in that time.
Unsurprisingly, many law students wrote in favor of the alternative licensing route on the grounds that these are unprecedented times, and many practicing attorneys wrote that they are concerned about the removal of the bar exam as a safeguard for the public.
But ultimately, the state high court felt that it needed to establish a route to licensure that offered law graduates some certainty, wrote Chief Justice Matthew Durrant in a press release that accompanied Tuesday's order.
"Because of the crisis, not only could we not guarantee that Utah could offer the bar examination safely, we could not tell applicants when they should start to invest the time and money to prepare for the exam," Durrant said. "We hope that the bar exam will in some form become available sooner than is now anticipated, but at present, the other solutions we have examined have an unacceptable level of uncertainty for applicants and employers."
University of Utah law dean Elizabeth Kronk Warner and BYU's Smith both advocated for the adoption of the emergency diploma privilege, coupled with a period of supervised practice.
In order to qualify for Utah's emergency diploma privilege, candidates must have graduated from a law school with a first-time bar pass rate of 86% or higher in 2019. (Both of the state's law schools meet that standard, as each posted a 90% first-time pass rate last year.) Only those who graduated from law school between May 2019 and June 2020 are eligible, and they must not have previously sat for the bar.
They also must have been registered for Utah's July bar exam by April 1—a provision that will prevent an influx of applicants from other jurisdictions who are looking to avoid the bar exam. They will have until the end of December to complete the required 360 hours of supervised practice. They will then be fully admitted into the Utah bar.
"In granting the privilege, the Utah Supreme Court recognized the impossibility of offering a July 2020 exam, as well as the importance of putting new lawyers to work helping those most impacted by the pandemic, providing practicing lawyers help, and giving new graduates the certainty and financial stability that they and their families require," wrote Kronk Warner in a message to students.
It remains to be seen whether Utah's move will prompt other jurisdictions to embrace an emergency diploma privilege. Wisconsin has long maintained a diploma privilege system that allows graduates of the state's two American Bar Association-accredited law schools to be admitted to practice without taking the exam.
Like Utah, however, Wisconsin produces relatively few new lawyers annually. Just 256 people sat for the July 2018 bar exam there, compared with 8,071 in California and 9,679 in New York. Thus, emergency diploma privileges and expanded supervised practice provisions likely would be more difficult to implement in those larger jurisdictions.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250