UC Hastings, Other Tenderloin Residents Sue San Francisco Over 'Insufferable' Sidewalk Conditions Amid COVID-19
"The conditions now prevailing in the Tenderloin constitute a violation of the fundamental civil rights of those residing and working there," wrote lawyers for Tenderloin residents suing to force the city to confront encampments and drug-dealing on neighborhood sidewalks.
May 04, 2020 at 02:33 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A coalition of businesses and residents of San Francisco's Tenderloin neighborhood, led by the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, have sued the city and county claiming that government officials have allowed the area to become "a containment zone" for drug and homelessness issues in the city.
The federal lawsuit, filed Monday by lawyers at Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger in San Francisco and Greenberg Gross in Los Angeles, claims that the number of homeless people in tents on sidewalks in the working-class neighborhood has more than doubled since March when local "shelter in place" orders took effect to combat the spread of COVID-19. The plaintiffs, who include a local resident confined to a wheelchair, a manager at a single-room-occupancy hotel, and the part-owner of a local cafe, claim that the increase of people residing in the streets has combined with the open-air drug sales in the neighborhood to make conditions "insufferable."
"This is a matter of fundamental fairness; what is a citywide problem should not be allowed to weigh disproportionately on a low-income working-class neighborhood," the complaint says. "San Francisco should be prohibited from abandoning a single neighborhood, in an apparent effort to spare other neighborhoods the burdens that confront the city at-large."
The complaint brings 14 claims for relief against the city and county including claims that San Francisco's policies regarding the Tenderloin violate the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the U.S. Constitution and that the conditions on the streets in the neighborhood violate the Americans with Disabilities Act and amount to a public nuisance. The plaintiffs, in announcing the lawsuit Monday, said they are seeking to force the city to provide solutions for those who currently occupy the sidewalk encampments that take into consideration the safety and health of both those on the street and other neighborhood residents.
"What has long been suffered in the Tenderloin has become insufferable," the complaint says. "The conditions now prevailing in the Tenderloin constitute a violation of the fundamental civil rights of those residing and working there," the complaint says.
According to the complaint, a recent survey by the nonprofit organization that cleans litter in the Tenderloin and adjacent neighborhoods found that the number of tents and makeshift shelters there grew from 158 March 3 to 391 May 1. The suit also says that the law school has spent an additional $66,836 on increased safety and security in the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic.
"This case is not about anybody seeking money," said Walkup Melodia's Michael Kelly in a press conference announcing the lawsuit's filing. Kelly, a UC Hastings alum, said although the city had been studying what's going on in the Tenderloin, the time for action is now. "The streets of the Tenderloin were not intended to be campgrounds," he said.
David Faigman, chancellor and dean of UC Hastings, said Monday that the lawsuit was seeking a safe and healthy environment for the school's "housed and unhoused neighbors." The dean said that the school had "no other options and no more time to wait." Faigman said in the near term, the lawsuit seeks the immediate deployment of latrines, wash stations and potable water in the neighborhood and access to hotel rooms and COVID-19 tests for those living on the streets. Faigman said that the suit also seeks the immediate relocation of tents away from doorways of homes and businesses. In the intermediate term, the suit seeks the identification of plazas, parks and parking lots that might offer safer places for temporary encampments where residents can practice social distancing.
The lawsuit notes that students who decline offers of admission to the law school frequently cite the conditions in the neighborhood as a significant factor in their decisions. According to the complaint, one such student responded to a 2020 survey from the school saying: "One of the big reasons I did not go to Hastings is the homeless population surrounding the campus. I quite honestly did not feel safe, and I could not imagine walking home alone at night. I was looking forward to living in San Francisco but was shocked by the magnitude of the drug use surrounding the campus. … My family was harassed and approached by a drug dealer when walking around the campus. I could not imagine attending school in a place where this is a daily occurrence."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Be Comfortable Being Uncomfortable': Pearls of Wisdom From 2024 GC Q&As
- 2The New Frontier in Legal Compliance: Privacy, Security, and Information Governance for Law Firms
- 3North Carolina Courts Switch to Digital, Face Extreme Weather in 2024
- 4It’s Happening Faster than Anyone Thought
- 5Mootness and Ethics: Meeting the Client’s Objectives
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250