Hogan Lovells Cuts Attorney Comp After Delaying Partner Distributions
CEO Stephen Immelt said that while the firm's financial position is solid, "complacency is not an option."
May 06, 2020 at 05:01 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Hogan Lovells is cutting compensation for all U.S. attorneys earning over $100,000 annually, citing uncertainties in the pandemic environment and a slowdown on global economic activity.
The firm's latest announcement comes three weeks after the firm said it would spread partner distributions and bonuses initially scheduled for May over the coming months.
CEO Stephen Immelt said in a statement Wednesday that the compensation reductions, which hit equity partners most sharply, were necessary to protect the business amid a grim global economic outlook, even though the firm's overall position is solid.
"We continue to see an uptick of work in the technology and life sciences sectors, our restructuring practice is very active, and we have successfully advised on headline-grabbing M&A deals. However, we are facing an uncertain environment and economic activity globally continues to drag," Immelt said. "Complacency is not an option for us. We are therefore continuing with our policy of cutting back all non-essential costs and making measured adjustments to compensation."
The cuts, which go into effect on June 1, include reductions to equity partners' monthly draws by 15% to 25%. Equity partners will also defer half of any profits from the first quarter, ordinarily paid in August, to December.
Nonequity partners will see base compensation reduced by 15%, which would amount to an annual salary cut of 8.75% if the change stays in effect for the entire year.
Most nonpartner attorneys at the firm, including all associates, will receive a 10% salary cut, akin to 6% over the full year, while the most highly compensated counsel and specialists will face 15% cuts, as will all senior counsel. Attorneys currently earning less than $100,000 will be unaffected.
Decisions on U.S. attorney bonuses will be made in the normal course at the end of the year.
The firm's earlier financial response to the COVID-19 crisis involved spreading partner compensation payments based on 2019 performance equally over each month depending on the amount owed to each partner, rather than distributing them on May 1. The firm also deferred salary reviews and discretionary bonuses for lawyers in the U.K. and Asia Pacific regions, which were due to take place on May 1, along with reviews and bonuses for the significant majority of business service teams worldwide, which were also scheduled for the same date.
Associates in the Americas, Continental Europe and Africa have their reviews at the end of the year, so they are not currently directly affected by the delay in salary and bonus reviews.
But U.S. business service team members had salary reviews and bonus payments scheduled for the start of May, just as colleagues throughout the world, and the "significant majority" of these are also to be postponed and reassessed later in the year.
The measures come after a period of financial growth. Hogan Lovells grew total global revenue by 6% in 2019 while raising profits per equity partner by 9% to $1.51 million.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readFederal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
2 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250