Miami-Dade Judge Who Took Part in a Reality TV Show Is Now Facing Ethics Charges
The Judicial Qualifications Commission accused the judge of lending the prestige of her judicial office to advance private interests.
May 06, 2020 at 04:44 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
When Miami-Dade County Court Judge Carroll Kelly welcomed television producers into her courtroom to film a reality show, it didn't make a good impression on the Judicial Qualifications Commission, which has accused her of giving participants "minimal notice" and misleading her superiors about the filming.
The show, "Protection Court," featured real-life litigants from the court's domestic violence division. But in ethics charges filed Wednesday, the JQC alleged Kelly's participation amounted to six violations of the rules governing judicial ethics.
"In doing so, you lent the prestige of your judicial office to advance the private interests of yourself and others," the charges said.
The JQC alleges Kelly didn't give litigants enough time to consider signing an appearance release, and claims some litigants were filmed without their consent.
The release required litigants to waive any liabilities, claims or demands against the producers over anything revealed in the show, including defamatory, disparaging or embarrassing information, according to the charging document.
The JQC also alleges Kelly misled Miami-Dade Circuit Chief Judge Bertila Soto about her involvement in the show to obtain consent, claiming she had secured assurances that there would be no violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The judge is also accused of lying to an investigative panel about having the power to stop the show's production.
"Specifically, you informed the investigative panel that you had 'final approval of anything' and 'editorial influence and control' over Protection Court," the JQC's charging document said.
Kelly's attorney, David Rothman of Rothman & Associates in Miami , did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Kelly has 20 days to respond to the charges.
Kelly was admitted to The Florida Bar in 1989. She rose to the county court bench in 1998 and has no disciplinary history, according to her Florida Bar profile.
Read the full charges:
Read more:
11 South Florida Attorneys Disciplined
5 Miami Judges Disciplined by State Supreme Court Over Nonprofit Endorsement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfrican Law Firm Under Investigation For AI-Generated Case References
3 minute readMed Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
Indiana AG Accuses Big Pharma of Inflating EpiPens Price by 600%, Lawsuit Says
4 minute readAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 2Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 3Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 4Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 5'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250