(Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)Thomson Reuters Claims Competitor's AI-Powered Bot Hijacked Westlaw Data
The case could demonstrate the sometimes adversarial coexistence of copyrights and artificial intelligence.
May 06, 2020 at 12:50 PM
3 minute read
Thomson Reuters is accusing legal research competitor Ross Intelligence of using artificial intelligence to scrape proprietary data out of its Westlaw database.
With the help of bots and AI, it's never been easier to infringe massive amounts of copyrighted materials, and the lawsuit could underline the challenges of protecting copyrights as AI evolves.
Thomson Reuters claims Ross Intelligence worked with third-party LegalEase Solutions to copy Westlaw content en masse in order to "rush" development of a competing web-based legal product.
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
"It is clear that by copying the copyright-protected Westlaw content—piggybacking off of the creativity, countless hours, and extraordinary expense that have gone into creating Westlaw—Ross drastically sped up its development time and reduced the cost associated with the development of its competing platform," wrote Thomson Reuters' Kirkland & Ellis and Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell counsel.
San Francisco-based Ross Intelligence did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A spokesperson for LegalEase, said that the legal support services company had settled litigation with West Publishing, the Thomson Reuters subsidiary that operates Westlaw, to the mutual satisfaction of both parties.
"We live by our core values of integrity, being customer-centric and transparency," the representative said in an email. "The claims made about LegalEase in the current lawsuit are inaccurate and misleading."
Thomson Reuters asserts that Ross began copying the information from LegalEase in July 2017, after Westlaw explicitly denied access to the competitor. "The net result is that plaintiffs are now being put in the unfair position of having to compete with a product that they unknowingly helped create," wrote the media conglomerate's lawyers, led by Kirkland's Dale Cendali.
➤➤ Sign up for the What's Next newsletter here to keep up with the latest developments affecting the future of law.
An investigation showed that, in 2017, LegalEase's Westlaw transactions jumped from 6,000 per month to 236,000 transactions per month and that the company was using software or a bot to systematically download and store Westlaw's West Key Number System, a proprietary hierarchy the company uses to organize its U.S. law content, according to the filing.
In addition to copyright infringement, Thomson Reuters is suing Ross for tortious interference with a contract. "Ross committed direct copyright infringement by reproducing and creating a derivative work based on plaintiffs' content, and is also secondarily liable for LegalEase's copyright infringement," the complaint contends.
The company is asking the court to order the removal and destruction of Westlaw content from its platform and require Ross to report on the profits, gains, advantages and value of business as a result of the alleged infringement.
David Crundwell, Thomson Reuter's senior vice president of corporate affairs, said the company had nothing to add to the complaint.
Read the complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute read
Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 2Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
- 3Jefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
- 4Seven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
- 5What Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
