A Silver Lining for Litigators? Business Isn't Booming But It's Picking Up
A new snapshot of commercial lawsuit filings in U.S. district courts shows a hint of a return to pre-pandemic levels.
May 07, 2020 at 01:33 PM
2 minute read
Here's the bad news for litigators coping with business fall-out from COVID-19: New civil filings in U.S. district courts continue to be in a trough compared to pre-pandemic levels.
Now, here's some better news: New data show the slide is slowing, and maybe reversing.
Using the same data that powers Law.com's Legal Radar, we're monitoring the volume of new commercial litigation in U.S. district courts. Our first report—you can see our last snapshot here—showed a 22 percent drop-off in the first four weeks of the coronavirus pandemic compared to the same period in 2019.
This week, we take a look at how case volume has changed since early March. As you can see below, there are signs that the momentum may be shifting.
The same trend can be detected in the year-over-year data, although the slight recovery in filing volume seems to track 2019 numbers. In New York, New Jersey and Seattle, three areas hard hit by the pandemic, litigation volume has seen a more pronounced rebound. (This analysis excludes counts of repetitious mass tort cases and certain non-commercial litigation, such as social security claims and immigration cases; criminal cases also are not counted).
As with the last time we checked in, the picture is uneven across practice areas. The litigation areas that are bucking the overall slump include patent, securities and, not surprisingly, insurance, where the surge of litigation over business loss claims is expected to swell. We'll continue updating this analysis as things unfold, so keep checking back.
Infographic design by David Palmer.
Previous Snapshots:
You can follow COVID-19 on Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits.
Set up your free news feed today.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250