Stephenson Harwood Closes Beijing Office
"We are not alone in having had to reassess our priorities in [China], and in taking a more critical look at our presence there," said the firm's new regional head.
May 07, 2020 at 07:26 AM
4 minute read
U.K.-based Stephenson Harwood has decided to close its Beijing office and revamp its Hong Kong office to focus on litigation, corporate M&A and asset finance work following a strategic review of Asia operations earlier this year.
As a result of the review, the firm has shuttered its seven-year-old Beijing office and only resident partner Lin Chun-Hui will leave the firm. The office has lost most of its lawyers in the last couple of years. In 2018, the firm took over the legacy Beijing office of Troutman Sanders when the U.S. firm decided to exit Asia. But only a year after that, partner Allen Shyu, who led the 11-fee earner Troutman team that included Lin, left for Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
Meanwhile, the firm has replaced longtime Greater China managing partner Voon Keat Lai with restructuring and insolvency lawyer Jamie Stranger. With Stranger's appointment, the firm also aims to refocus its Hong Kong office to be better aligned with its overall core practices including litigation, M&As, asset finance and private wealth matters.
"As one of the first international firms to establish a presence in Hong Kong we enjoyed an 'early mover' advantage for many years. But it's important not to rest on your laurels and to continually look at ways to improve as a business," said Stranger in a statement.
"Having the right people in the right places to provide the expertise our clients expect is a priority for me," he said. "While that means that we will have to say goodbye to some friends and colleagues, like our small team in Beijing, it will also mean welcoming new lawyers with the experience and expertise to strengthen our core practices and support us as we build our business for the future.
This year, Stephenson Harwood promoted four Hong Kong lawyers in a round that included only six partners outside of the U.K.; disputes lawyers Alexander Tang, Elizabeth Sloane and Eloise Matsui, and corporate lawyer Michelle Chung made the cut.
Last week, Law.com International reported that Stephenson Harwood has laid off several corporate lawyers in Hong Kong, where the firm has had a presence for over 40 years. Several international firms in Hong Kong have resorted to cost-cutting in response to successive waves of business disruption caused by the city's political unrest and the ongoing pandemic.
"We are not alone in having had to reassess our priorities in [China], and in taking a more critical look at our presence there," Stranger said. "The changes we're making in Greater China are part of a long-term strategic reprioritization, not in response to the pandemic."
The firm underwent a strategic review of its Asia operations earlier this year, after new CEO Eifion Morris took over last year. In a statement, Morris said the firm's "commitment to Greater China is not in question," citing the recent partnership promotions in Hong Kong.
Meanwhile, the U.K. firm reported strong financial results in Singapore, with revenue for financial year 2019-20 exceeding expectation by 29%. Stephenson Harwood operates a formal law alliance with Singaporean firm Virtus Law. Morris indicated that the firm may explore more opportunities in Southeast Asia in addition to its Singapore base.
"While there's no doubt that Singapore is a critical hub for commercial activity in Southeast Asia … there's merit in having a presence on the ground, or 'best friend' relationships, in the places where our clients are investing. Places like Thailand, Vietnam and Laos," he said.
Currently, the firm is in association with Indonesian law firm Christian Teo & Partners and an office in Yangon, Myanmar.
In Greater China, Stephenson Harwood maintains an office in Shanghai in addition to Hong Kong. Disputes partner Evangeline Quek runs the office. In Guangzhou, the British firm has an association with Chinese firm Wei Tu.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250