LawGeex Raises $20 Million, Underscoring Contract Tech's Resilience in COVID-19 Economy
LawGeex intends on using the capital raised to grow its sales and customer success teams while eyeing a push into other English-speaking territories.
May 12, 2020 at 09:01 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Artificial intelligence contract review platform LawGeex announced Tuesday that it had closed a $20 million financing round led by Corner Ventures with participation from La Maison and preexisting investor Aleph.
The news underscores that many businesses are expected to turn to contract analytic solutions to help mitigate risk in an uncertain COVID-19 economy, making the contract technology sector a strong spot in a legal market that has had its share of cutbacks over the past few months.
LawGeex, which automatically reviews contracts for compliance with an entity's deal guidelines, is looking to use the capital raised during this latest financing round to build out its sales and customer success teams. While the company has primarily focused its business on the U.S., co-founder and CEO Noory Bechor indicated that LawGeex is also looking at the possibility of expanding into other English-speaking territories.
Still the legal tech market isn't immune to COVID-19 related shutdowns still in place around the country, with sectors like e-discovery already feeling the pinch. Bechor said that while investors may be more cautious given the virus's impact on the economy, he believes they are still looking for opportunities—and contract review could be a viable target.
"The value proposition of LawGeex really resonates well around digitization, around automating the manual process of reviewing contracts in order to save costs and do more with less," Bechor said.
Corner Ventures, which led this latest fundraising round, echoed Bechor's confidence in the value that contract review tech is carrying in the market.
"LawGeex is seeing high demand for its solution and even further acceleration due to the flexibility, cost efficiencies, and safety-net afforded by digital automation during this challenging time," Marvin Tien, managing director at Corner Ventures said in a press release.
To be sure, investor interest in LawGeex predates the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2018, the platform closed a $12 million dollar series B funding round led by venture capital firm Aleph. That development may have coincided with an industrywide tipping point, with LaxGeex vice president of marketing Shmuli Goldberg telling LTN that the company had seen a interest in AI-powered contract review transition into a demand.
Of course, LawGeex isn't the only player in that market supporting some form of contract review. Knowable, for example, launched its Contracts Data Management Platform in February, which organizes and analyzes a user's contact data. Meanwhile the AI-powered contract platform Evisort announced that it had closed a $15 million Series A funding round last December.
When Evisort's CEO Jerry Ting spoke to LTN in April, he indicated that while COVID-19 had raised obstacles with regards to making new sales, existing customers were still seeking help with contract items such as force majeure or other provisions that could yield cost savings. "We're trying to lean into the [COVID-19] situation as much as we can," Ting said.
LawGeex's own plans for moving forward involves building out the variety of use cases the platform can accommodate, specifically contract needs pertaining to specific industries such as finance, insurance and the tech sector. In the meantime, Bechor expects to see more companies in the contract space continue to draw attention from investors so long as they can demonstrate value and the ability to drive change.
"I think companies that are able to meet these standards will be able to attract investors and continue to grow and even accelerate during this time," Bechor said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Path in the Multiverse: Rethinking Client Engagement Through Gamification
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
- 2Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 3Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 4Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 5Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250