Vinson & Elkins Closes Office in Beijing
The office closing is the latest step in V&E's scaling back from an on-the-ground presence in Asia
May 12, 2020 at 05:37 PM
4 minute read
Vinson & Elkins has shut down its Beijing office as the U.S. firm further retreats from Asia following a significant drop in oil and gas work in the region.
The firm has removed its Beijing office from its website, and the Hong Kong office is listed as "by appointment only" and has no resident lawyer.
V&E chairman Mark Kelly confirmed the closing of the Beijing office and said the Hong Kong office remains open, although the firm is evaluating its plans there going forward. The firm's Taipei office closed in October 2018, he said.
"We continue to work for clients in a variety of industries in Asia," Kelly said. "We remain committed to providing those clients the highest level of service and believe we are more than capable of doing so with our deep bench of lawyers positioned across our other global offices."
In Asia, V&E still has an office in Japan. Outside of Asia, it has offices in Dubai, London and Riyadh, as well as in the U.S.
But the office closings are yet another step in Vinson & Elkins's steady scaling back from an on-the-ground presence in Asia. According to data collected for the Asia 50 rankings, the firm had only 2 lawyers based in the Asia Pacific in 2018; that compared to 28 in 2013 and 39 in 2011.
Vinson & Elkins once had offices in six major business centers in Asia but ended up closing all but two—Tokyo and Hong Kong. In 1995, the Houston-based firm opened its first Asia office in Singapore, which it closed less than a decade later in 2004. After another decade, in 2014, the U.S. firm considered re-opening an office in Singapore as the city-state's government embarked on plans to globalize its legal market. But V&E partners were dissuaded by plunging oil prices in 2014 and 2015 and the Singapore re-opening never took place.
In Greater China, the firm first opened in Beijing in 1997 and added Shanghai and Hong Kong in 2005 and 2006, respectively. In 2013, V&E closed its Shanghai office to consolidate its China practice in Beijing and Hong Kong. From there on, the U.S. firm continued to pull back from what was one of the busiest China practices among all U.S. firms. Like many of its other offices, V&E's China practice focused almost exclusively on energy deals and caught the perfect wave of outbound Chinese investment in the oil and gas sector in the late 2000s and early 2010s, especially from China's state-owned energy giants.
Between 2009 and 2013, V&E represented the top three energy giants—China Petrochemical Corp. (Sinopec), China National Petroleum Corp. and China National Offshore Oil Corp.—on at least $35 billion worth of asset acquisitions, joint ventures and projects abroad. The deals included an $8.5 billion refinery joint venture between Sinopec and Saudi Aramco in 2012.
The situation first started to shift in 2013 when a sweeping anti-corruption campaign in China's state-owned sector put the brakes on big-ticket overseas investments. The following years also saw global oil prices drop to a decade low. And V&E's closure of Shanghai was followed by a series of partner departures, relocations and retirements. In 2017, former China head and longtime partner Xiao Yong led a team of lawyers in Hong Kong and Beijing to join Dechert.
In addition to oil and gas work in China, V&E had other offerings in Asia. In 2016, the firm launched a Taipei office focusing on intellectual property litigation work. To run the practice, it hired patent litigators Christopher Kao and David Tsai from Perkins Coie in 2015, but the duo left to open a Taipei office for Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman in 2018.
Tokyo is now V&E's only office in Asia that has resident lawyers. That office, opened in 2004, also has a focus on intellectual property work. Partner Jennifer Chen, a former Hitachi in-house counsel, manages the office.
"Our firm's long-term strategic plans include having a strong footprint in Asia and we intend to grow our presence there at the appropriate time," Kelly said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustified Termination Does Not Bar Associate Attorney From Unemployment Benefits, State Appellate Court Rules
5 minute readFlorida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute readFederal Judge Warns of 'Serious Sanctions' on FDIC Over Document Retention
3 minute readHogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250