Contract Systems Already an 'Unmitigated Disaster' About to Get Worse, Warns Open Letter to General Counsel
"And we're here to offer some provocative, possibly offensive, and certainly self-serving thoughts," said Mark Harris and Alec Guettel, co-founders of Axiom and Knowable.
May 13, 2020 at 02:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The coronavirus pandemic is positioned to unearth and magnify an "unmitigated disaster" that has been building just below the surface at many corporate legal departments, according to an open letter to in-house leaders.
Hundreds of thousands of contracts are "about to come under immense pressure, inspiring a tidal wave of urgent requests and questions," Mark Harris and Alec Guettel, co-founders of Axiom and Knowable, warned Wednesday in their letter, "An Unsolicited Intervention for General Counsel."
Last year, Harris and Guettel sold Axiom, an alternative legal services provider, and now operate Axiom spin-off Knowable, a contract platform and analysis service.
They wrote that the looming contract crisis poses a business problem that most general counsel "haven't yet had the time or headspace to focus on. And we're here to offer some provocative, possibly offensive, and certainly self-serving thoughts."
Harris and Guettel are urging legal departments to, at minimum, get their contracts into a single repository where documents are organized in related groups or "families" and can be found, searched and filtered immediately.
"You've got to use this moment to marshal all the resources that the company has, the law department has, to get all of those agreements in one place: a centralized, reliable system of record that is fully digitized and fully searchable," Harris said in an interview.
Questions about force majeure clauses are already rampant as businesses want to know if they or their partners can back out of commitments due to coronavirus-related disruptions. Those who might be able to get out of their commitments could have increased bargaining power to renegotiate prices, Harris said.
"The much more interesting question, which starts to get your mind reeling about all the second- or third-order inquiries, has more to do with, 'How are we going to navigate our way through this in a very new reality?'" he added.
Suppliers who are facing plummeting sales will likely want to look at their cost structures, which means revisiting their supply chain commitments. Their legal departments might have to figure out which contracts contain minimum purchase agreements. Can they terminate some agreements early? If so, what are the implications?
On the other side, companies that are experiencing stable or higher demand might ask their legal departments if they can bring on new suppliers. Do their contracts contain exclusivity arrangements or right-of-first-refusal clauses?
Legal departments should be able to provide quick responses to contract questions. But many companies still track contracts through manual systems and often have a tough time even locating their contacts.
Finding the contracts is only the beginning. Companies often have unsearchable contracts that were scanned into the system. And there might be several versions of a contract, making it difficult to determine which document is the final version.
"We've been working in close proximity to the contracting functions of large enterprises for ~20 years and they are, more often than not, an unmitigated disaster," Harris and Guettel write in the letter.
They conclude by stating that they're worried about appearing "tone-deaf as the humanitarian and macroeconomic impact of the crisis unfolds. But the conflict we see coming merits anxious waving, stomping, shouting and pointing."
"And that's what we're doing," they write.
Read More:
In Uncertain Times, Protect Agreements: Supplement the Force Majeure Clause With COVID-19 Provisions
Stanford's COVID-19 Memo Database Cuts Coronavirus 'Noise' for In-House Counsel
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250