'Handicapped' Defense Bar, Deep-Pocketed Rivals and Nuclear Verdicts: The Insurance Industry Is Having a Reckoning
Both sides agree on one thing: Anger is a major factor in insurance-related litigation.
May 16, 2020 at 09:03 PM
4 minute read
There's no doubt that recent years have seen a rise of jury awards across the tort claim spectrum, a trend that's rattling insurers to the core.
Lawyers and insurance executives say the surge of multimillion-dollar awards reflects the plaintiffs bar's systematic approach to generating revenue.
"They discovered that instead of blaming the individual driver, they could blame the employer or company [by saying] he was overworked or insufficiently trained or something," said Jim Lynch, chief actuary and senior vice president of Insurance Information Institute, a national industry association based in New York.
But attorneys on the other side say insurers are the ones responsible for the mega verdicts. Plaintiffs counsel say insurance companies attempt to hold on to their money, so it collects interest until the last moment.
"They're very often not willing to resolve the case, as we put it, until we see the whites of their eyes," said Ronald Weil of Miami firm Weil Snyder & Ravindran.
But both sides agree on one thing: Anger is a major factor in insurance-related litigation.
"Plaintiffs attorneys have changed the way they try cases," said insurance defense attorney Robert F. Tyson Jr., managing partner of Tyson & Mendes in California. "They used to go for sympathy—and it will still get them paid—but now the big paydays come from anger. They are motivating the juries to action through anger."
|'The Whites of Their Eyes': Lawyers Say Litigating With Insurers Becomes a Game of Chicken
Natural adversaries, insurance companies and plaintiffs attorneys, appear stuck in an endless game of chicken.
Incoming! Insurance Defense Lawyers Talk 'Nuclear Verdicts'
"The tactic is to demonize the defendant, no matter who it is, so the jury wants to punish them and send a message," said Holland & Knight partner Laurie Webb Daniel.
Stemming the Tide of Social Inflation
Defense attorney Robert F. Tyson Jr. believes insurance companies have the power to do away with nuclear verdicts.
'Anger' and 'Defensiveness' Cost Insurance Companies Millions: 3 Tips for Avoiding a Jury's Punishment
When it comes to so-called "nuclear verdicts"—or "social inflation" in the insurance industry—hindsight is 20/20, as a survey of the highest payouts in motor vehicle accident and premises liability cases across the Southeast U.S. reflects.
Tort Reform Capping Nuclear Insurance Verdicts Stymied by COVID-19
With the COVID-19 outbreak shuttering courts nationwide, defense lawyers and insurers are likely to enjoy a respite from the much-ballyhooed spate of multimillion-dollar "nuclear verdicts" that have sent waves of lobbyists to state legislatures hoping to stem the tide.
These Lawyers Won Some of Biggest Verdicts and Settlements in the Nation. What's the Magic Sauce?
Many other factors affect a jury's award, according to plaintiffs lawyers who won big in premises liability and motor vehicle accident cases across the Southeast United States in 2019.
'Reptile' Co-Author Don Keenan Says Big Verdicts Reflect Justice
After more than a decade of training lawyers in the art of persuading jurors that tortfeasors' actions are more than isolated incidents, attorney Don Keenan—co-progenitor of the "Reptile theory" of plaintiffs advocacy—shrugs aside accusations that his techniques are unscrupulous and trample the rules of evidence.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute read'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readFirst Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250