'Handicapped' Defense Bar, Deep-Pocketed Rivals and Nuclear Verdicts: The Insurance Industry Is Having a Reckoning
Both sides agree on one thing: Anger is a major factor in insurance-related litigation.
May 16, 2020 at 09:03 PM
4 minute read
There's no doubt that recent years have seen a rise of jury awards across the tort claim spectrum, a trend that's rattling insurers to the core.
Lawyers and insurance executives say the surge of multimillion-dollar awards reflects the plaintiffs bar's systematic approach to generating revenue.
"They discovered that instead of blaming the individual driver, they could blame the employer or company [by saying] he was overworked or insufficiently trained or something," said Jim Lynch, chief actuary and senior vice president of Insurance Information Institute, a national industry association based in New York.
But attorneys on the other side say insurers are the ones responsible for the mega verdicts. Plaintiffs counsel say insurance companies attempt to hold on to their money, so it collects interest until the last moment.
"They're very often not willing to resolve the case, as we put it, until we see the whites of their eyes," said Ronald Weil of Miami firm Weil Snyder & Ravindran.
But both sides agree on one thing: Anger is a major factor in insurance-related litigation.
"Plaintiffs attorneys have changed the way they try cases," said insurance defense attorney Robert F. Tyson Jr., managing partner of Tyson & Mendes in California. "They used to go for sympathy—and it will still get them paid—but now the big paydays come from anger. They are motivating the juries to action through anger."
'The Whites of Their Eyes': Lawyers Say Litigating With Insurers Becomes a Game of Chicken
Natural adversaries, insurance companies and plaintiffs attorneys, appear stuck in an endless game of chicken.
Incoming! Insurance Defense Lawyers Talk 'Nuclear Verdicts'
"The tactic is to demonize the defendant, no matter who it is, so the jury wants to punish them and send a message," said Holland & Knight partner Laurie Webb Daniel.
Stemming the Tide of Social Inflation
Defense attorney Robert F. Tyson Jr. believes insurance companies have the power to do away with nuclear verdicts.
'Anger' and 'Defensiveness' Cost Insurance Companies Millions: 3 Tips for Avoiding a Jury's Punishment
When it comes to so-called "nuclear verdicts"—or "social inflation" in the insurance industry—hindsight is 20/20, as a survey of the highest payouts in motor vehicle accident and premises liability cases across the Southeast U.S. reflects.
Tort Reform Capping Nuclear Insurance Verdicts Stymied by COVID-19
With the COVID-19 outbreak shuttering courts nationwide, defense lawyers and insurers are likely to enjoy a respite from the much-ballyhooed spate of multimillion-dollar "nuclear verdicts" that have sent waves of lobbyists to state legislatures hoping to stem the tide.
These Lawyers Won Some of Biggest Verdicts and Settlements in the Nation. What's the Magic Sauce?
Many other factors affect a jury's award, according to plaintiffs lawyers who won big in premises liability and motor vehicle accident cases across the Southeast United States in 2019.
'Reptile' Co-Author Don Keenan Says Big Verdicts Reflect Justice
After more than a decade of training lawyers in the art of persuading jurors that tortfeasors' actions are more than isolated incidents, attorney Don Keenan—co-progenitor of the "Reptile theory" of plaintiffs advocacy—shrugs aside accusations that his techniques are unscrupulous and trample the rules of evidence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readAllstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
5 minute readOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250