Law Schools Simulate Firm Summer Associate Programs Amid COVID-19 Cutbacks
Summer internships have been canceled en mass, and law firms have curtailed summer associate programs. Two law schools are attempting to fill the gap with their own summer training programs.
May 28, 2020 at 02:12 PM
5 minute read
Can an online law school class approximate the experience of being a summer associate at a law firm? We'll soon find out.
At least two campuses have launched summer programs designed to help students develop the real-world skills they would normally pick up working at law firms or in internships, as many of those training opportunities have evaporated amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
New York Law School has partnered with Venable for its eight-week Summer Associate Simulation Program, which is modeled after the summer associate experience at a large law firm. The 200 enrolled students have been placed into "practice groups," are attending online classes, and will work on simulated legal matters tied to the coronavirus outbreak.
Meanwhile, the University of Illinois at Chicago John Marshall Law School just kicked off a 10-week Summer Associate Training Academy for students and recent graduates that incorporates simulated legal matters and gives participants the opportunity to get feedback from attorneys and judges on a drafting assignment.
Both programs are intended to help fill the summer training gaps left by shortened or cancelled summer associate programs and internships, and those moved entirely online. A handful of large law firms have cancelled their summer associate programs outright citing COVID-19, while many more have whittled them from 10 weeks down to five weeks. The remaining programs will primarily happen virtually.
"This class—and the next two—face really difficult circumstances," said James Leipold, executive director of the National Association for Law Placement. "They'll face a tough job market, but they'll also face a skills gap because all of the ways that people get experience over the summer are compromised. Anything schools, employers or bar associations do to provide practical, hands-on active learning is great. Do they entirely replace a summer associate position or a summer internship with a federal government agency? No. But are they way better than nothing? Yes."
One major difference with the school-run programs, however, is that there will be no job offer awaiting participants at the end of the summer. Traditionally, nearly all summer associates at large firms receive offers to come onboard as an associate after graduation, though it remains to be seen whether associate offer rates decline this year as firms prepare for a pandemic-induced slowdown in work. (Neither New York Law School or UIC John Marshall are traditional Big Law feeder schools—they did not rank among the 50 schools with the highest percentage of 2019 graduates going to the largest 100 firms, according to Law.com's 2020 Go-To Law Schools hiring report.) But Leipold said having practice skills training on their resumés will make participants in programs like these more marketable upon graduation. Venable partner Michael Volpe, who is spearheading New York Law School's program alongside dean Anthony Crowell, agrees.
"From an employer's perceptive, having this on your resume—working successfully on these different areas of law while at the same time managing the day-to-to ins and outs on a remote basis—I think, will make these folks particularly well suited for employers at larger law firms as they turn to a changing business model," Volpe said.
New York Law School's program kicked off Wednesday with 200 students who are earning academic credit for participating. (Demand outstripped the 120 seats that the school originally planned for, according to Crowell.) Alumni sponsors are covering their tuition for the class. Like summer associates at law firms, students have been divided into practice groups—in this case, litigation, corporate affairs and government affairs and policy. The approximately 70 students in each practice area have been further divided into groups of 10 that are supervised by a practicing attorney. The students participate in "staff meetings" to simulate working with partners and senior associates and are required to produce memos, client letters, motions and other documents that traditional summer associates would work on. Each of their simulated legal matters pertain to the coronavirus, be it employment matters, data privacy or public health law. Wednesday's orientation included three law firm associates sharing their experiences and advice on navigating the law firm world as a young attorney, as well as an overview of law firm billing. Future sessions will address legal technology and leadership, in addition to substantive law.
"We're presenting opportunities for students to understand how their world will be transformed as a result of [COVID-19] for the next few years, and we want them to be ready for it," Crowell said.
The Summer Associate Training Academy at UIC John Marshall is taking a slightly different tack. The 100 participating students won't earn academic credit for participating in the program, which is free and open to recent graduates as well as current students. But they are meeting online weekly for lectures and guest speakers, and they must complete two writing assignments over the course of the 10 weeks. They will also complete online simulations in which they are summer associates receiving assignments from a partner and interacting with their supervisors. Dean Darby Dickerson, who conceived of the academy, said it could become a regular, for-credit summer class if there continues to be student demand.
"I want them to leave with knowledge and some skills that I think they would have been more likely to pick up had they been in a summer associate or law clerk position, and could walk the halls and talk to people," Dickerson said. "There are things you pick up from interacting with people. So I'm trying to fill those gaps."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 2Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 3Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 4Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 5Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250