Looming Deadline, Financial Complexity Makes LIBOR Ripe for Tech-Lawyer Partnerships
Having to transition from LIBOR, which will potentially require numerous contract revisions and negotiations, can be significantly more complicated than meeting other regulatory demands, such as the GDPR or CCPA.
June 01, 2020 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
The London Interbank Offered Rate is found in hundreds of thousands of financial contracts with an estimated $200 trillion value. But by Jan. 1, 2022, LIBOR must be replaced with another benchmark rate.
If recent COVID-19 events have some financial institutions waiting for an extension, the U.K.'s Financial Conduct Authority recently stomped out those dreams when the regulator announced it wouldn't adjust the deadline in light of the pandemic.
With no flexibility in sight, lawyers say clients have to start the transitioning process by leveraging not only lawyers' legal expertise, but also appropriate technology.
"We saw a real opportunity for technology to help our clients transition from LIBOR in an efficient way," said McGuireWoods partner Clayton Stallbaumer. "The problem they have is it's a volume and timing issue. We're roughly 18 months from LIBOR going away, and a lot of our institutional clients have thousands of documents that reference LIBOR. As we were talking to clients about this, there seems to be a real opportunity to use certain types of technology."
Some of technology needed can include data analysis, contract review, template automation and mass email notification tools.
To be sure, lawyers note LIBOR is a complex regulatory shift unlike the General Data Protection Regulation, California Consumer Privacy Act and other recent regulations.
"I think in terms of the numbers of project-type work [that] banks have had to do over the past five years or so … the GDPR and Brexit, those types of projects have been relatively legal light touches," said Dentons partner and derivatives practice member Luke Whitmore.
However, transitioning away from LIBOR, which includes adding contract provisions and renegotiating rates, requires significant heavy lifting, notes Joyce Xu, who leads Paul Hastings' global derivatives practice and global LIBOR transition task force.
"We've talked with AI and legal tech providers, and we've licensed our own software that helps with the initial review that references LIBOR," she said. "And I think pretty much all of our clients that have significant books with contracts are looking to utilize AI technology to help them initially identify the universe of contracts."
Law firms are also taking the initiative and partnering with legal tech providers to assist the LIBOR transition, including Mayer Brown, which on May 21 announced such a partnership with legal and compliance provider Morae.
When asked how technology can expedite the transition process, Mayer Brown partner and LIBOR transition leader Paul Forrester noted that tools can quickly analyze data based on the lawyers' classifications and automate the assignment of amended contract templates. Additionally, he said software can also email contract readjustment notifications to third parties. He explained that all of these are efficiencies that law firms need to harness to assist clients during particularly laborious matters.
"A lot of companies that need that additionally help, there's a real efficiency with having the collaboration," Forrester said. "It's not going to be for everyone, but I do think more firms should be more open than what they have been historically with that collaboration."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
4 minute readCFPB Alleges Berkshire Hathaway Subsidiary Originated Unaffordable Housing Loans
Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250