Stanford Law Embroiled in Another 'N-Word' Controversy
Professor Michael McConnell, who was recently named as a co-chair of Facebook's Oversight Board, has been criticized by students and faculty for quoting the racial epithet in a class last week.
June 01, 2020 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
For the second time this academic year, black students at Stanford Law School are condemning the use of a racial slur by faculty in the classroom.
Last week, professor Michael McConnell—a former federal appellate judge and co-chair of Facebook's new content moderation oversight board—read a quote attributed to Patrick Henry that contained the "N-word" in his class on the creation of the Constitution. That incident comes just seven months after a Stanford history professor was criticized by students for using the same epithet during a guest lecture in a torts class at the law school.
Condemnation from students and fellow faculty over McConnell's decision to include the quote, which he said he used to illustrate how some Southerners use racism to stoke opposition to the Constitution, was swift. (Fellow Stanford Law professor Michele Dauber has questioned the veracity of the quote at issue.) The Black Law Students Association sent a message to the law school, noting the particularly painful timing of the incident giving the recent police killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor and the killing of an unarmed Ahmaud Arbery by several white men.
"If there is one thing black students know, it's our own history," reads the BLSA statement. "Ahmaud Arbery is our history. Breonna Taylor is our history. George Floyd is our history. White men refusing to stop saying [the N-word] is our history."
Law dean Jenny Martinez released her own statement May 29, saying she does not believe the pedagogical aim of including the quote in class justified "the pain and distress that this epithet, which evokes the horrors of white supremacy, inflicts on students, especially students of color." She followed that up with a second email May 31 saying that she has asked the faculty to vote on a new requirement that all professors who teach a 1L course undergo classroom management training that includes instruction on diversity and inclusion.
"Sadly, over the past days students have shared privately with me their experiences of other troubling classroom experiences," Martinez wrote. "I take seriously every single incident and concern, and also believe we need systemic reform."
Both Martinez and McConnell declined interview requests Monday, referring to their public statements on the matter. McConnell wrote his own email to the law school May 29, two days after he read the quote in class, saying that will not use it in future classes after hearing the reaction from students.
"First, I hope everyone can understand that I made the pedagogical choice with good will—with the intention of teaching the history of our founding honestly," he wrote. "Second, in light of the pain and upset that this has caused many students, whom I care deeply about, I will not use the word again in the future."
The Black Law Students Association wrote to the school in November, after the November "N-word" incident, calling for the school to condemn the use of the slur and hold a faculty workshop on diversity and inclusion, among other things.
"As we have noted in our communications and meetings with the dean, this is only a start of what we want to see from the law school," according to a Monday statement from association co-presidents Aryn Frazier and Donovan Hicks. "We demand that [the law school] go further, and take a holistic and systemic approach to racial equity. [The law school] must formalize how it addresses bias-related incidents, better contextualize the law we learn by addressing race and class in the doctrine, and provide sufficient funding to its most marginalized and disadvantaged students."
McConnell has been on the faculty of the law school since 2009, and sat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for seven years before moving into the legal academy. Last month he was named a co-chair of the newly formed Facebook Oversight Board, which will make final decisions about content moderation for the social media giant.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readPennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
5 minute readWhat’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?
University of New Hampshire Law School Launches Specialized Health, Life Sciences Program
Trending Stories
- 1Retired NY Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman Playing Key Role in Advancing 'Weinstein Bill'
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Take Every Opportunity to Get Involved in the Business Side of the Firm,' Says Alyssa Domzal of Ballard Spahr
- 3People in the News—Feb. 5, 2025—Eckert Seamans, Rawle & Henderson
- 4Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
- 5Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250