2019 Law Grads Crushed It on Jobs, but COVID-19 Could Set Them Back
New employment data from the American Bar Association shows that the J.D. class of 2019 had the strongest entry-level jobs results in years, yet those numbers don't reflect in the impact of the coronavirus on those fledgling legal careers.
June 02, 2020 at 01:48 PM
3 minute read
The good news for the J.D. class of 2019 is that nearly 81% of them had found full-time jobs that either require bar passage or for which a J.D. offers an advantage within 10 months of leaving campus—up close to 3 percentage points from the previous graduating class.
The bad news is that they were mere months into their legal careers when COVID-19 upended the economy and the legal industry, and it's unclear how the pandemic has impacted their employment prospects over the past two months. Some large firms have announced furloughs and layoffs, while court closures have disrupted business for solo practitioners and firms of all sizes.
The American Bar Association this week released its annual graduate employment report, which details overall employment rates and the types of jobs recent graduates have secured. The report largely offers a positive picture of new lawyer employment. In addition to an uptick in the percentage of grads in full-time legal or J.D. advantage jobs—which has increased each of the past six years—the percentage of 2019 graduates who were unemployed and seeking fell to 6.4%, from 7.3% the previous year. The percentage of graduates in full-time, long-term jobs that require bar passage, which are widely considered the gold standard for J.D. employment, increased nearly 5 percentage points to 72%.
The improved overall employment rate is the result of two factors: the actual number of full-time bar passage required or J.D. advantage jobs increased by 720 over the previous year. At the same time, the total number of J.D.s graduating in 2019 decreased by more than 300. Together, they pushed the employment rate to its recent high.
Yet, the ABA warned that this data "may not reflect current law graduate outcomes in today's changed economic environment." The data is collected 10 months after graduation—this year the deadline for law schools to submit jobs numbers was March 15. The first U.S. shelter-in-place order came down in California's Bay Area just two days later. Since then, many areas of the legal industry have struggled to maintain their flow of business and revenue.
"These data do not capture any of the widespread economic disruption associated with the response to COVID-19, which has resulted in belt-tightening, salary reductions and layoffs at law firms around the country," wrote University of St. Thomas School of Law professor Jerry Organ in a post on TaxProf Blog. "Indeed, some of the graduates of the class of 2019 who were reported as employed on March 15, 2020, may already have lost their jobs."
Hence, the class of 2019 may well represent a high-water mark for employment over the next several years, Organ noted. Indeed, the graduating class of 2020 is already facing economic headwinds. Some incoming associates at law firms have seen their start dates deferred until early 2021, and many new graduates who have jobs lined up aren't certain if and when they will be able to take the bar exam. About a third of jurisdictions have rescheduled the July bar exam for September, though fears remain that subsequent waves of COVID-19 could force the cancellation of those postponed exams. (The National Conference of Bar Examiners this week unveiled plans for a pared-down, remote exam that jurisdictions could deploy in October as a backup if in-person tests are canceled.)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250