2019 Law Grads Crushed It on Jobs, but COVID-19 Could Set Them Back
New employment data from the American Bar Association shows that the J.D. class of 2019 had the strongest entry-level jobs results in years, yet those numbers don't reflect in the impact of the coronavirus on those fledgling legal careers.
June 02, 2020 at 01:48 PM
3 minute read
The good news for the J.D. class of 2019 is that nearly 81% of them had found full-time jobs that either require bar passage or for which a J.D. offers an advantage within 10 months of leaving campus—up close to 3 percentage points from the previous graduating class.
The bad news is that they were mere months into their legal careers when COVID-19 upended the economy and the legal industry, and it's unclear how the pandemic has impacted their employment prospects over the past two months. Some large firms have announced furloughs and layoffs, while court closures have disrupted business for solo practitioners and firms of all sizes.
The American Bar Association this week released its annual graduate employment report, which details overall employment rates and the types of jobs recent graduates have secured. The report largely offers a positive picture of new lawyer employment. In addition to an uptick in the percentage of grads in full-time legal or J.D. advantage jobs—which has increased each of the past six years—the percentage of 2019 graduates who were unemployed and seeking fell to 6.4%, from 7.3% the previous year. The percentage of graduates in full-time, long-term jobs that require bar passage, which are widely considered the gold standard for J.D. employment, increased nearly 5 percentage points to 72%.
The improved overall employment rate is the result of two factors: the actual number of full-time bar passage required or J.D. advantage jobs increased by 720 over the previous year. At the same time, the total number of J.D.s graduating in 2019 decreased by more than 300. Together, they pushed the employment rate to its recent high.
Yet, the ABA warned that this data "may not reflect current law graduate outcomes in today's changed economic environment." The data is collected 10 months after graduation—this year the deadline for law schools to submit jobs numbers was March 15. The first U.S. shelter-in-place order came down in California's Bay Area just two days later. Since then, many areas of the legal industry have struggled to maintain their flow of business and revenue.
"These data do not capture any of the widespread economic disruption associated with the response to COVID-19, which has resulted in belt-tightening, salary reductions and layoffs at law firms around the country," wrote University of St. Thomas School of Law professor Jerry Organ in a post on TaxProf Blog. "Indeed, some of the graduates of the class of 2019 who were reported as employed on March 15, 2020, may already have lost their jobs."
Hence, the class of 2019 may well represent a high-water mark for employment over the next several years, Organ noted. Indeed, the graduating class of 2020 is already facing economic headwinds. Some incoming associates at law firms have seen their start dates deferred until early 2021, and many new graduates who have jobs lined up aren't certain if and when they will be able to take the bar exam. About a third of jurisdictions have rescheduled the July bar exam for September, though fears remain that subsequent waves of COVID-19 could force the cancellation of those postponed exams. (The National Conference of Bar Examiners this week unveiled plans for a pared-down, remote exam that jurisdictions could deploy in October as a backup if in-person tests are canceled.)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of New Hampshire Law School Launches Specialized Health, Life Sciences Program
Supreme Court Takes Up Case Over Approval of Religious Charter School
The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250