Critical Mass: Which COVID-19 Lawsuits Could End Up in MDLs? Report Finds Product Liability Lawsuits Are on the Rise. Find Out Who's Repping Universities in Refund Class Actions.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to create more potential MDLs, with new motions filed over ticket refunds and bank loans.
June 03, 2020 at 01:02 PM
5 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to create more potential MDLs, with new motions filed over ticket refunds and bank loans. A report out this week from Lex Machina found an uptick in product liability lawsuits. Which firms are representing universities in a raft of COVID-19 class actions over refunds?
SPONSORED BY ALM PARTNERS
Zoom – Quick Reference Guide
This Zoom Reference provides shortcuts, tips, and tricks for the popular video conferencing software. Use this reference to brush up on the basics and to find alternative methods to your favorite commands. This printable quick reference is yours to use, distribute, and share at your organization! READ MORE
|
More MDL Motions Materialize From COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has spawned more requests for multidistrict litigation, with three more motions filed in the past two weeks. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation already has a pending motion to coordinate about 135 lawsuits against insurance firms over business interruption claim denials, plus about 20 class actions filed against JPMorgan Chase over its handling of COVID-19 relief loans to small businesses.
Here's more:
On May 22: Lawyers at Heninger Garrison Davis, Geragos & Geragos, Zumpano Patricios & Popok and Zimmerman Reed sought an MDL in Georgia for a dozen lawsuits against financial institutions accused of refusing to pay agents who prepared applications for COVID-19 relief loans to small businesses.
On May 29: Nicholas Coulson (Liddle & Dubin) filed a motion to coordinate six class actions brought against "major players in the secondary event ticketing market," including StubHub Inc., for COVID-19 refunds. His motion claims the defendants offered vouchers and credits because "the majority of their ticket supply came from professional scalpers." He is seeking an MDL in Illinois or Wisconsin.
On May 29: Alfonso Kennard (Kennard Law) filed a motion to coordinate eight class actions brought against Bank of America over its handling of COVID-19 relief loans to small businesses. Kennard told me he was seeking an MDL in Texas. He also said he sought an MDL separate from the JPMorgan Chase lawsuits for a strategic reason:
"When you have an action like this, you want to ensure that your folks are similarly situated. You're asking for collective actions. You've got different banks, so the possibility exists that some court might find they are not similarly situated enough."
|
Report Finds Product Liability Lawsuits Are Rising
Product liability lawsuits are on the rise in federal courts, and makers of medical devices and pharmaceuticals are among the biggest targets. That's according to Lex Machina's 2020 Product Liability Litigation Report, released this week, which also ranked Johnson & Johnson, Volkswagen and Boeing as top defendants, and Shook, Hardy & Bacon and Kirkland & Ellis as the defense firms with the most cases. Plaintiffs' firms with the most filings were Weitz & Luxenberg and Bracewell.
Rachel Bailey, a legal data expert at Lex Machina who spoke to me for my story, said a spike in product liability cases against medical device and pharmaceutical firms, which began in 2018, came from "several big cases" not in multidistrict litigation. Bailey told me:
"Over 800 cases were filed in the Southern District of Illinois about the drug Depakote. There are a large number of cases in the Middle District of Florida that are mostly cases against Allergan alleging defective breast implants, and a large number of cases in the District of New Jersey seem to be mostly cases against Johnson and Johnson and its subsidiary Ethicon alleging a defective abdominal surgical mesh product."
|
Who Got the Work?
Cooley, WilmerHale, Orrick and Quinn Emanuel have stepped in to defend universities against a raft of class actions seeking refunds for tuition and fees amid the COVID-19 shutdowns of college campuses. Michelle Doolin and Leo Norton (Cooley) are defending the University of Southern California, and Danielle Conley (WilmerHale) has appeared for American University. Karen Johnson-McKewan, Randy Luskey and William Molinski (Orrick) represent the Regents of the University of California. Shon Morgan (Quinn Emanuel) represents Duke, and Roberta Kaplan (Kaplan Hecker & Fink) is backing Columbia University. Christopher Yannuzzi (Isicoff Ragatz) and Mark Raymond (Nelson Mullins) are defending the University of Miami, which filed a motion to dismiss on May 21 calling the lawsuit an "improper shotgun pleading."
Here's what else is happening:
Roundup Row: A California appeals court heard arguments on Tuesday on whether to reverse a $289 million verdict in 2018 over Monsanto's Roundup pesticide. It's the first time an appeals court has heard oral arguments over Roundup verdicts, which also include awards of $80 million and $2 billion last year. Oral arguments focused on whether federal preemption applied to all the claims in the case, and the panel raised questions about the $33 million in future noneconomic damages in the jury's verdict, which a San Francisco judge lowered to $78 million.
Mac is Back: McDonald's is due back in court today in an attempt to dismiss a class action brought by five employees in Chicago who claim the restaurant chain failed to provide them necessary protections from COVID-19. Last Friday, McDonald's planned to fight an injunction sought in the case, but the judge, holding the hearing via Zoom, told lawyers to go into break-out rooms to resolve their dispute. The case, which alleges public nuisance claims, is among the few to go before a judge challenging COVID-19 protections for workers.
Opioid Accord: In a deal that lawyers said would move the needle toward a nationwide opioid settlement, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an agreement last week with 254 counties on how to disburse an estimated $1.5 billion in funds to the state. Under the deal—which is based on a floated nationwide settlement worth at least $19.2 billion that hasn't yet been reached—law firms representing Texas cities and counties would take contingency fees of less than 9.4%, a sharp reduction from the 35% promised under many of their outside counsel contracts.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! Stay safe, and I will be back next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 2Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 3Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 4'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 5Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250