Armstrong Teasdale Plants Newest Flag in Edwardsville, Ill.
The latest in a slew of office openings, Armstrong Teasdale's newest outpost is a mere 40 minutes' drive from the firm's St. Louis headquarters but will provide value for litigation clients active in the Southern District of Illinois.
June 04, 2020 at 04:02 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Armstrong Teasdale has once again expanded its footprint, this time with a new office in Edwardsville, Illinois, the firm announced Wednesday.
The firm, which has been steadily climbing the Am Law 200 and ranked 177th this year, said it has officially set up shop in Edwardsville, the seat of Madison County, known for large-scale asbestos litigation. The office also brings Armstrong Teasdale's physical presence closer to the Southern District of Illinois, located in Benton.
Edwardsville is the latest expansion for Armstrong Teasdale, which has bucked the legal industry's trend to decrease pay, lay off staff and take other cost-cutting measures in the midst of the coronavirus crisis. In the last month and a half, the firm has also set up shop in Boston and Salt Lake City, and since 2018 it has also opened offices in New York, Philadelphia and Princeton, New Jersey.
Firm managing partner David Braswell said the new office, which is less than 40 miles from the firm's St. Louis headquarters, will be a value add to many of the firm's clients, who are busy across the Missouri River with asbestos, medical malpractice and intellectual property litigation.
"We have been active in the Southern Illinois market for decades, and it's important if you're going to be active in that market, as well as with any kind of litigation we do, to have a physical presence in Southern Illinois," he said. "We have many clients with interests here, and we're now much better able to provide service to them."
Some Armstrong Teasdale lawyers will be based in the Edwardsville office full-time, including litigation partner and former Madison County judge Donald Flack and litigation partner Untress Quinn. Other lawyers will stay based in St. Louis but will now have an official home base when they cross the state line to deal with client matters.
Braswell added that the new office, located at 115 North Second St., has plenty of room for acquiring new talent (although the firm is sticking to remote work for now).
"We're always thinking about bringing on talented attorneys in all markets, and we're certainly interested in attracted talented Southern Illinois lawyers to the new office," he said. "Our recruiting efforts will be enhanced by having an actual physical presence there."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250