State Attorneys General Claim Trump Administration Watering Down Title IX Protections
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro and New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal led the group in a suit arguing that the Trump administration's new rule undermines the purposes of Title IX.
June 04, 2020 at 03:53 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
A coalition of state attorneys general announce it is suing the Trump administration over its decision to weaken Title IX protections.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro and New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal are leading the group in a suit arguing that a new Trump administration rule undermines the purposes of Title IX.
The suit was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It seeks to block implementation of the rule, which the attorneys general say undermines Title IX's requirements that students be able to learn in an environment free from discrimination based on sex, and free from sexual violence and harassment.
With schools facing impending budget cuts due to COVID-19 and current resources already stretched thin, the rule and its unreasonable time frame for compliance will force schools to divert attention away from efforts to confront the challenges of a pandemic while simultaneously weakening core protections for students, Becerra said in a statement.
The suit is believed to be the first to challenge the revisions to Title IX, said Sarah Lovenheim, a spokeswoman for Becerra.
"From mocking the #MeToo movement to pushing this backward rule that makes our schools less safe, President Trump wears his disdain for gender equality and safety on his sleeve," Becerra's statement said. "This is 2020, not 1920. Our focus should be on protecting our students and families, not burdening academic institutions with complicated, backward regulations."
"Title IX's mandate is simple: our schools must give women and men equal access to education, which means no one should experience sexual harassment," Shapiro said in a statement. "But instead of making it easier for students to report, and for schools to respond, to sexual harassment, Secretary DeVos has unlawfully narrowed Title IX's reach."
"If any Pennsylvania student is sexually harassed, or if any Pennsylvania student is accused of sexual harassment, they deserve to have a fair process. Secretary DeVos has exceeded her authority by issuing regulations that make this important right nearly impossible to achieve in practice, all while reducing protections for victims," Shapiro said.
"Because of the U.S. Department of Education's new regulations, students who return to campus this fall will be less well protected from sexual violence than any students in a generation," Grewal said in a statement. "We won't let that happen here in New Jersey. We won't stand by as the federal government undermines the civil rights of our students. School disciplinary proceedings should be fair and equitable regardless of the subject matter. Unfortunately, the federal government has singled out sexual violence cases and made it harder to find the truth and do justice in those cases alone."
Angela Morabito, press secretary at the U.S. Department of Education, declined to address the suit directly, but said the new Title IX rules protect all students by requiring schools to follow a reliable, transparent, and fair process in handling complaints of sexual misconduct. "Due process rights are survivors' rights–everyone deserves to be treated fairly, and that's what our rule requires," Morabito said.
Becerra and the other attorneys general argue that the Trump administration rule substantially narrows the definition of sexual harassment, and limits the scope of Title IX's coverage, effectively denying protection to students who are sexually assaulted in off-campus housing or on the way to or from school. In addition, they say the new measure creates harmful barriers to formal complaint filing and investigation, including by barring students from filing complaints if they have dis-enrolled from school because of sexual violence; and potentially subjects students to online harassment by eliminating confidentiality protections in the investigation process.
The Department of Education, under Secretary Betsy DeVos, announced the revisions to Title IX on May 5. In 2018 the department sought feedback on the proposed changes and received nearly 100,000 responses. The revisions include a narrowed definition of sexual harassment as "unwelcome conduct on the basis of sex that is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the recipient's education program or activity" and a mechanism for cross-examination of both the accused and accuser by an attorney or other third party.
In announcing the changes, Assistant Secretary Kenneth Marcus of the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights said in a statement, "The new Title IX regulation is a game-changer. It establishes that schools and colleges must take sexual harassment seriously, while also ensuring a fair process for everyone involved. It marks the end of the false dichotomy of either protecting survivors, while ignoring due process, or protecting the accused, while disregarding sexual misconduct. There is no reason why educators cannot protect all of their students—and under this regulation there will be no excuses for failing to do so."
The American Civil Liberties Union has criticized the revised version of Title IX, particularly its provisions imposing an unduly narrow definition of sexual harassment, narrower than that used for racial harassment; relieving schools of the obligation to investigate many instances of student-on-student harassment or assault that occur off campus; allowing schools to adopt unreasonable responses to complaints and holding them responsible only if their actions are deliberately indifferent; and allowing schools to apply a clear and convincing evidence standard of proof.
Janet Napolitano, president of the University of California system and former U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama, called the new rules "misguided" and said they sought to reverse hard-fought gains against college sexual misconduct. "UC opposes these ill-conceived changes and, in spite of them, will continue our hard-won momentum through education, prevention, and processes that are fair and compassionate to all parties," Napolitano said in a statement.
Becerra, Shapiro and Grewal were joined in the suit by the attorneys general of Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250