Trump, Barr Sued for Use of Force Against Lafayette Square Demonstrators
The complaint centers on a Monday protest in Washington D.C.'s Lafayette Park, which was broken up by federal law enforcement with tear gas and pepper spray.
June 04, 2020 at 06:44 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Black Lives Matter D.C. and other protesters on Thursday sued President Donald Trump, U.S. Attorney General William Barr, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and other federal officials for allegedly violating their first First and Fourth Amendment rights.
The complaint centers on a Monday protest in Washington, D.C.'s Lafayette Park, which was broken up by federal law enforcement with tear gas and pepper spray and has been the subject of numerous media reports. After the crowd was dispersed, the president walked through Lafayette Park to take a picture in front of St. John's Church, holding a bible.
Several organizations brought the suit on behalf of the protesters, including Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and the law firm of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. The Thursday lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
"This is a very dramatic example in how rights enshrined in the First Amendment are all under challenge," said Arnold & Porter senior counsel John Freedman, who is representing the plaintiffs pro bono. "These are protesters who were engaged in nonviolent, peaceful protest and senior government officials ordered that they be assaulted."
A spokesperson for the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The plaintiffs included Black Lives Matter D.C., which organized the demonstrations, and four protesters—all of whom allegedly suffered injuries or trauma as a result of law enforcement action.
All of the plaintiffs were at the June 1demonstration at Lafayette Square when, according to the complaint, Barr gave an order to clear the square. Law enforcement "rushed and attacked the assembled protesters without warning or provocation, climbing and jumping over barriers behind which the demonstrators were standing," the suit claims.
The plaintiffs allege that Barr's order—which came just before the president gave a 6:30 p.m. speech in the White House Rose Garden—violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly and Fourth Amendment right of freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
According to the complaint, the plaintiffs were not given prior warning, nor did law enforcement ask the demonstrators to leave before they escalated. Law enforcement officers fired flash-bang shells, tear gas, smoke canisters and rubber bullets into the crowd, the complaint said, and assaulted demonstrators with "fists, feet, batons and shields."
The complaint details graphic accounts of the protest, including a rubber bullet lodged in a victim's face and multiple bruises allegedly inflicted on plaintiffs by law enforcement.
By the morning of June 3, federal law enforcement officers blocked access to Lafayette Square, preventing future demonstrators from protesting in the space, the complaint said.
The plaintiffs allege that the violence Monday chilled demonstrators from exercising their right to protest. Black Lives Matter D.C. did not attend demonstrations the following day, fearing harm at the hands of law enforcement, the complaint said, adding that the violence led to a significant reduction in the number of demonstrators Tuesday.
Additionally, the complaint alleges that Black Lives Matter D.C. faces the imminent harm of diverting resources to protect its members' and supporters' ability to engage in free speech and assembly. "Its effectiveness as a political entity will also be irreparably harmed by its inability to generate participation in protest events, because potential participants will have been deterred from participating," the suit claims.
The lawyers for the plaintiffs are asking a federal judge to rule the dispersal a violation of the First and Fourth Amendment and that the judge issue an injunction ordering the defendants to cease similar actions in the future. The attorneys are also asking for compensatory and punitive damages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Arizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250