Australia's Law Offices Are Opening—but Many Lawyers Stay Away
Many firms say they have found that working remotely is very effective and that most clients currently prefer to hold virtual meetings, which reduces the need for staff to be present in the office.
June 05, 2020 at 03:06 PM
4 minute read
Law firms in Australia continue to reopen offices but many lawyers are choosing to continue to work from home and most clients are sticking to virtual meetings.
Many firms have already repopulated their offices in Perth, as Western Australia is leading the other states in lifting work and travel restrictions imposed as a result of the spread of COVID-19.
The Perth office of U.K.-headquartered Ashurst is "fully open" and about 60% to 70% of staff have been working in the office for the past two weeks, although they can choose to stay away.
Clients are mostly holding remote meetings, although there have been some meetings in the office.
"We have already proven that working remotely works. Most clients currently prefer to hold virtual meetings, which reduces the need for staff to be present in the office," Perth office managing partner Gaelan Cooney said in a statement.
"While we are pleased to see staff return to the office, we are also using this opportunity to build on the flexibility we have embraced in recent months."
Norton Rose Fulbright is taking a similar approach.
"Our engagement with clients continues to be predominately through digital channels, such as Zoom video meetings and webinars, but we are also preparing to welcome clients back to our offices where appropriate and in a way that protects both their health and that of our people," managing partner-elect Alison Deitz said.
The firm opened several offices for its "advance party" workforce starting May 25. Numbers ranged from 5% to 15% of staff and included people identified through a firm survey who were particularly eager to return to the office.
"This month and next, we expect to see an increasing number of staff returning on an alternating, two-team basis," Deitz said.
Australia is now recording only a small number of new COVID-19 cases a day. As of Friday afternoon, the country said 11 new cases were diagnosed in the past 24 hours, but 10 of those were in hotel quarantine. Only 23 people with the virus are currently hospitalized, including two people on ventilators.
So far a total of 7,251 Australians have been diagnosed with the virus and 102 people have died.
The government of Victoria this week said people who had been working from home must continue to do so for at least all of June for fear of a second outbreak of COVID-19—a move that could push back some firms' plans to reopen in Melbourne.
"Our return will be informed by the guidance from the Victorian government," Clayton Utz said in a statement. "We are currently working towards a staggered return to the office to commence no sooner than 6 July 2020."
Some staff at the firm's Sydney office will return to work starting June 15 in Step 1 of the firm's plan to reopen its offices. "Our message to people while Step 1 is still in place is to continue to work from home unless there is a critical business or personal need to work from the office," the firm said.
Clayton Utz's offices in Perth and Brisbane began a Step 1 phased return May 25 with a maximum of 30% of staff on any one floor at a time. The firm expects to move to 50% capacity next week.
Australian firm Allens reopened its Perth office two weeks ago but only about 10% of lawyers are working there at any one time, a spokesperson said. As with other firms, meetings are mostly online.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readGlobal Lawyer: Big Law Walks a Tightrope But Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250