China Preparing Its Own 'Unreliable Entity List' to Retaliate Against the US
China's "unreliables" list is expected to target large American technology companies such as Qualcomm, Cisco and Apple, and could subject them to market restrictions, investigations and civil or criminal punishment.
June 05, 2020 at 07:47 PM
4 minute read
As U.S.-China hostilities increase and the relationship between the two countries continues to deteriorate, U.S. companies in China may soon take a big hit as Beijing prepares to release its long-threatened "unreliable entity list"—a move that would subject named companies to investigations, market restrictions and even civil, administrative and criminal liability.
While China first mentioned the possibility of such a list more than a year ago, The Global Times, which is published by the People's Daily, the official newspaper of China's ruling Communist Party, reported last month that China is now ready to put U.S. companies on an "unreliable entity list."
The Chinese list is largely seen as retaliation for the United States expanding its own "Entity List." Beijing first announced it would establish such a list in May of 2019 in response to Huawei being placed on the U.S. Entity List, which effectively barred U.S. companies from doing business with the Chinese company. The announcement at the time raised considerable alarm among foreign companies in China, worried about survival in the world's second-biggest economy. But more than one year later, the list remains unpublished.
Tensions between the U.S. and China have significantly escalated since then. In April, the U.S. Commerce Department unveiled new rules increasing its scrutiny of technology exports to China. These were followed by greater restrictions on Chinese telecom giant Huawei's global access to chips made with U.S. technology. In late May, the administration blacklisted dozens more Chinese entities through the Entity List on national security grounds.
Then last week, U.S.-China relations fell to a new low when President Donald Trump announced that he will start stripping Hong Kong of its special trade privileges. The move came on the back of new national security legislation that Beijing is imposing on Hong Kong, bypassing the city's own legislature. In response, China has vowed to take "necessary countermeasures" against the U.S., which has been reported by Chinese state media as a reference to the unreliable entity list.
This list war—another sign of the further decoupling of China and the U.S.—will have major implications for U.S. businesses, lawyers say. If China goes ahead with its list, the accompanying measures could include launching investigations and imposing restrictions on such U.S. companies as Apple, Cisco and Qualcomm and suspending purchase of Boeing airplanes, according to the Global Times.
Kenneth Zhou, a Beijing partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr and a member of the board of governors of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said some of these measures will not only mean restrictions on market access, investment and licensing approvals, but also could include punishments through China's social credit system.
"It's fundamentally technology companies and companies which are really dependent on the Chinese market [that will be targeted by China's unreliable entity list]," said Lester Ross, head of Wilmer's Beijing office and chair of the China policy committee at the American Chamber of Commerce in China.
"China has already embarked upon a substantial effort … to reduce its dependence on foreign technology. So it can accelerate that movement … and exact punishment upon those companies and the country in which they're incorporated."
The Global Times report suggested that China will launch "rounds of endless investigations" on foreign firms in order to dampen investors' confidence and squeeze the firms' income in the Chinese market. According to Chinese officials, any foreign entities that cut off supplies or adopt discriminatory measures against Chinese companies for noncommercial reasons will be added to the list.
Qualcomm used to be a chip supplier to Huawei, while Cisco is considered a major rival to Huawei in the manufacturing of telecom equipment.
For many U.S. companies, the Trump administration's restrictions already limit their ability to do business with Chinese partners, and now China's retaliation promises to restrict them even more. Wilmer's Ross, who has raised concerns with Chinese authorities in his capacity as both a law firm partner and a core member of the American Chamber in China, does not foresee China changing its course.
"Their point is: look into your own country, and you'll understand why it is we're doing what we're doing," he said.
Click here to listen to the full interviews with Wilmer's Lester Ross and Kenneth Zhou in the latest episode of the China Law Podcast.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250