ABA Backs COVID-19 Aid for Law Firms With State-Legal Cannabis Clients
According to the ABA, 78% of U.S. lawyers practice in jurisdictions where some form of marijuana sales are legal under state law.
June 09, 2020 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The American Bar Association has joined calls for federal agencies to extend COVID-19 relief to law firms with clients in the state-licensed marijuana industry.
In a letter dated June 5, ABA president Judy Perry Martinez urged federal officials to change Small Business Administration guidelines that currently bar loans to firms "that advise or counsel direct marijuana businesses" on legal issues.
"Most law firms qualify as small businesses, falling within the congressional [Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security] Act intent to cover all businesses with less than 500 employees," Martinez wrote to U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and SBA Administrator Jovita Carranza.
But the SBA guidance on which companies can receive aid "is overly broad and establishes a very low standard for ineligibility, including 'a business that derived any of its gross revenue for the previous year' from such services," Martinez wrote. "Thus, a law firm where a single lawyer provided advice to a single marijuana business client on legal issues for a nominal fee would arguably be ineligible under this language for the SBA [Paycheck Protection Program] loan program."
According to the ABA, 78% of U.S. lawyers practice in jurisdictions where some form of marijuana sales are legal under state law. "Under the current guidance, many of these lawyers and their firms could be disqualified from receiving PPP assistance," Martinez wrote.
The letter reflects the ABA's increased activity in the state-legal marijuana space. The association's Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section last September sponsored the first-ever ABA-related event dedicated solely to state-licensed cannabis and hemp. And in February, the ABA's House of Delegates adopted resolutions calling for federal legislation to protect lawyers and banks that serve state-legal marijuana operators.
"We are thrilled that the ABA has signed onto this issue," said Christopher Davis, executive director of the International Cannabis Bar Association. The specialty bar sent its own letter to congressional leaders in April, asking that law firms be made eligible for COVID-19-related aid for businesses.
"The ABA has previously come out in favor of cannabis industry banking, and protections for lawyers from criminal prosecution for representing clients that operate in the state-legal cannabis industry," Davis said. "The current position is the logical conclusion of their prior positions—if it's legal to represent, take payment from, and pay taxes on revenue earned from these clients, then the same representation should not render us ineligible for disaster-related economic assistance."
ABA officials declined to comment on the letter.
In April, 34 bipartisan members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 10 Democratic senators pressed congressional leaders to include aid to cannabis-related businesses in any future COVID-19 relief legislation. Such provisions did not make it into a $3 trillion stimulus package passed by the House in May, although the legislation did include protections for banks that serve state-legal marijuana companies.
The Senate has not taken up the House legislation. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has derided the relief appropriations approved by Democrats, calling cannabis provisions "the cherry on top."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250