ABA Backs COVID-19 Aid for Law Firms With State-Legal Cannabis Clients
According to the ABA, 78% of U.S. lawyers practice in jurisdictions where some form of marijuana sales are legal under state law.
June 09, 2020 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The American Bar Association has joined calls for federal agencies to extend COVID-19 relief to law firms with clients in the state-licensed marijuana industry.
In a letter dated June 5, ABA president Judy Perry Martinez urged federal officials to change Small Business Administration guidelines that currently bar loans to firms "that advise or counsel direct marijuana businesses" on legal issues.
"Most law firms qualify as small businesses, falling within the congressional [Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security] Act intent to cover all businesses with less than 500 employees," Martinez wrote to U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and SBA Administrator Jovita Carranza.
But the SBA guidance on which companies can receive aid "is overly broad and establishes a very low standard for ineligibility, including 'a business that derived any of its gross revenue for the previous year' from such services," Martinez wrote. "Thus, a law firm where a single lawyer provided advice to a single marijuana business client on legal issues for a nominal fee would arguably be ineligible under this language for the SBA [Paycheck Protection Program] loan program."
According to the ABA, 78% of U.S. lawyers practice in jurisdictions where some form of marijuana sales are legal under state law. "Under the current guidance, many of these lawyers and their firms could be disqualified from receiving PPP assistance," Martinez wrote.
The letter reflects the ABA's increased activity in the state-legal marijuana space. The association's Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section last September sponsored the first-ever ABA-related event dedicated solely to state-licensed cannabis and hemp. And in February, the ABA's House of Delegates adopted resolutions calling for federal legislation to protect lawyers and banks that serve state-legal marijuana operators.
"We are thrilled that the ABA has signed onto this issue," said Christopher Davis, executive director of the International Cannabis Bar Association. The specialty bar sent its own letter to congressional leaders in April, asking that law firms be made eligible for COVID-19-related aid for businesses.
"The ABA has previously come out in favor of cannabis industry banking, and protections for lawyers from criminal prosecution for representing clients that operate in the state-legal cannabis industry," Davis said. "The current position is the logical conclusion of their prior positions—if it's legal to represent, take payment from, and pay taxes on revenue earned from these clients, then the same representation should not render us ineligible for disaster-related economic assistance."
ABA officials declined to comment on the letter.
In April, 34 bipartisan members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 10 Democratic senators pressed congressional leaders to include aid to cannabis-related businesses in any future COVID-19 relief legislation. Such provisions did not make it into a $3 trillion stimulus package passed by the House in May, although the legislation did include protections for banks that serve state-legal marijuana companies.
The Senate has not taken up the House legislation. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has derided the relief appropriations approved by Democrats, calling cannabis provisions "the cherry on top."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeveral Big Law Firms Saw Year-Over-Year Lobbying Revenue Growth in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250