In an Uncertain Era for Law Firm Real Estate, Landlords Face New Pressures on Rent
Firms want short-term rent relief during the COVID-19 crisis as they rethink their future real estate needs. But a recent lawsuit involving Jenner & Block shows those conversations don't always work out.
June 10, 2020 at 03:54 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Forced out of their pricey commercial office buildings for months and grappling with the sudden COVID-19 recession, law firms have been negotiating over their leases—or even winding up in litigation—in search of relief from real estate costs.
Firms are trying to work with their landlords, with varying degrees of success, according to several legal consultants. Real estate is the second-largest cost for law firms after personnel, and at a time when many firms are reducing both salaries and employee positions, it would be "managerial malpractice" not to look for a break, said Tom Clay, a principal at legal consultancy Altman Weil.
"You do owe it to your partners to go to the landlords," Clay said. "You really have to search every avenue and crevasse you can to find some relief."
Law firms made up 8% of the tenants who sought rent relief from Jones Lang LaSalle, the commercial real estate giant, between March 6 and May 12, according to a report from the company.
But not every firm has been successful in those efforts. On May 20, Hart 353 North Clark LLC sued Jenner & Block in Cook County Circuit Court, accusing the firm of not paying the rent on its 416,200-square-foot Chicago office in April and May. The plaintiff, which is an affiliate of Heitman, a real estate investment management firm, is seeking $3,726,415.74, plus late fees and interest.
Heitman is committed to working with its tenants and understanding their challenges during the pandemic, said John Riccione, a partner at Taft Stettinius & Hollister and one of the attorneys representing the real estate firm. He said the lawsuit against Jenner was "not something that came out of nowhere."
"When parties are unable to resolve their differences, they seek help from the courts," Riccione said. "And that's what we're doing."
Jenner has not formally replied to Heitman's lawsuit; a Jenner spokeswoman said a reply might be coming this week, although Riccione said the firm's deadline is June 23. In a statement, co-managing partner Randy Mehrberg said the firm invoked a rent abatement provision within its lease that is meant to be used "in the event of a situation, like the global pandemic, that renders the firm unable to use and occupy the space for its intended purpose."
"We have credited the landlord for the limited space we have been able to use for its intended purpose," Mehrberg said. "Jenner & Block has a very strong financial position; this dispute is exclusively about the enforcement of that provision in the lease."
A Jenner spokeswoman said the firm is paying rent at its other office locations in London, Los Angeles, New York and Washington, D.C.
The degree of flexibility firms may have with their landlords depends on a variety of factors, said Ryan Hoopes, director of the legal sector advisory group at Cushman & Wakefield, another global commercial real estate services firm. Those factors include the financial health of both the firm and its landlord, the terms of the lease, how far the firm is into the lease, as well as the future outlook of the space and the market.
"It's interesting that you only reference one lawsuit in Chicago," Hoopes said, referring to the Jenner case. "I think that's pretty telling. If it was some sweeping issue, you'd be seeing a lot more of it."
Jenner might be unusual in getting sued over its unpaid rent, but it's not the only company facing down a complaint. Last week, clothes retailer Gap Inc. was sued for allegedly stiffing Simon Property Group on $66 million after not paying rent in April, May and June.
Clay said Heitman's lawsuit against Jenner is likely a sign that negotiations broke down and it's meant to prod Jenner back to the negotiating table. Hoopes expressed doubt that Jenner and Heitman would take their dispute all the way to trial, saying the cost of litigating over the rent would be far costlier than the rent itself. He said these disputes are usually settled.
The real estate company is not seeking to evict the law firm from its office, Riccione said.
Clay indicated that law firms often have an advantage over their landlords.
"In the end, if they play such hardball to cause you to go under, what have they won? A bunch of empty space they can't fill," Clay said.
Both Clay and Kent Zimmermann, a Zeughauser Group consultant, said the pandemic has shown that law firms can easily work remotely. As firms look to drive up their margins, they're going to look at paring down their real estate footprints, putting pressure on landlords, Zimmermann said.
"Landlords in this kind of market often can't easily replace law firm and other business tenants," ZImmermann said. "As a result, the landlords may be more flexible in many cases to a lease modification and a lot slower to vigorously pursue other rights under the lease."
Hoopes separately concurred, but he said this pressure won't really be felt on landlords until 2021 and beyond. "Most of the triaging we've seen is about the here and the now," he said.
Read More
Law Firm Leasing Activity Craters as Industry Rethinks Its Real Estate Footprint
With Return to Offices Still Uncertain, Big Law Shifts From When to How
California Law Firms Plan To Be 'Guided by the Science' on Office Reopenings
Law Firm Office Reopening Guidance: Wear Masks and Take Attendance
As Texas Reopens, Most Law Firms Stick With Remote Work
From Masks to Staggered Staffing, Firm Leaders Plan Reopening—But Aren't Rushing
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Arizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250