'It's a Matter of Privilege': Dallas Law School Revokes Incoming Student's Admission Over Allegedly Racist Posts
Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law announced on Twitter that it revoked the admission of an incoming law student because of allegedly racially offensive social media content.
June 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
An incoming law student's admission to Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law in Dallas was revoked Wednesday because of alleged racially offensive social media content.
"SMU has revoked its offer of admission to an incoming Dedman School of Law student, based on the student's racially offensive behavior recorded on social media that contradicts the university's core values—specifically, its commitment to diversity and inclusion," said a law school statement on Twitter. "Racism has no place on a campus that embraces respect for all SMU students, faculty and staff and equips its students to make a difference in the world."
The law school did not release the student's name or any details on the allegedly racist social media posts. When asked for details, school spokeswoman Lynn Dempsey wrote in an email that the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act restricts what the law school can say about law students.
Dean Jennifer Collins declined to comment.
But Collins wrote in a June 2 statement to the law school community that the law school shared the national grief and outrage over the killings of George Floyd in Minneapolis and other black men and women.
"As lawyers, we have a special obligation to demand that we do better and actively work together toward a more just and compassionate nation free of the discrimination and hatred that continues to plague this country," Collins wrote in the statement. "We cannot allow the fact we are not physically together at the moment to keep us from the critical work we must do to address injustice and protect marginalized communities, not only from acts of violence, but also from the inequities laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic and its disparate impact on people of color."
In response to the law school's Twitter announcement about revoking the student's admission, one woman tweeted back that this was a reason she chose the law school.
|This is one of the reasons I chose @SMULawSchool. When I met with admissions and the Dean they made sure to make me know I was welcome. Yes there are issues, but I truly appreciate that we are moving forward. I am proud to #PonyUp & #PonyUpDallas
— [email protected] (@SelfeSTEAMgirl) June 11, 2020
In recent weeks, black students at Southern Methodist University have been recounting racism they experienced on campus through Twitter posts with the hashtag "#BlackAtSMU." University President R. Gerald Turner responded with a statement.
"It grieves me to read them because this is not what we envision for SMU," Turner wrote. "The negative experiences shared through #BlackAtSMU are a stark reminder that we still have a lot of work to do."
Adjunct SMU law professor John Browning, who speaks and writes about use of social media by law students, lawyers and judges, said that he hasn't seen the posts and didn't know if they were public or private.
"Evidently, someone was familiar with it and familiar with the student, and shared it with people in the law school community," said Browning, partner in Spencer Fane in Dallas.
He said that he's never known of an SMU law student who was dismissed for offensive social media post. But it's an growing issue around the nation.
"Online misbehavior by law students is certainly not a rare phenomenon, and it's one law students don't realize can pose a real career problem for them," Browning said. "I don't know the details. I don't want to personally pass judgment. But if they were troubling enough for the school to consider it contrary to the core values, I think it's the school's right to do that. Being admitted to a professional or graduate program is not a matter of right. It's a matter of privilege. It can be rescinded for any number of reasons."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250