New Casework Up, Law Firm Billing Volumes Down, Survey Finds
In a survey of law firm respondents, 25% are forfeiting more revenue due to unpaid bills compared to the months leading up the COVID-19 outbreak.
June 17, 2020 at 05:39 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
A new survey by Canadian cloud-based legal software company Clio found that after an initial pandemic-fueled drop-off, more firms are taking on new matters in May than April. But they're also more concerned about clients' ability to pay than in the previous two months.
The survey, based on aggregated and anonymized data from tens of thousands of legal professionals, includes data collected in early April, late April, the beginning and end of May and the first week of June.
Unsurprisingly, the survey found that 71% of legal professionals are more concerned about clients ability to pay their legal bills now than prior to the pandemic. Among law firms, 25% are forfeiting more revenue due to unpaid bills compared to the months leading up the COVID-19 outbreak.
The survey also found that, compared to Clio's initial COVID-19 survey in early May, new matters have rebounded through May and into the first week of June, with overall client matters down 14% from pre-pandemic days, compared with 26%. The survey notes that firms may have been able to rely on "work in progress" from matters opened prior to March to buttress their revenue numbers as the pandemic heated up, but the shortfall in casework from March through April had an impact on billings that is just now starting to be mitigated.
"Especially in the first week of June, we saw a significant jump in new matter creation velocity," Jack Newton, founder and CEO of Clio, said in an interview. "I would describe the data in this month's briefing as a promising sign of partial recovery through the new matter creation lens, which is a good indicator of how busy lawyers really are."
The survey also found that legal work, again unsurprisingly, has ticked up as states begin to reopen their economies.
New York, for example, saw a 50% decline in new casework in mid-April compared the previous year. That has since rebounded in the last three weeks, going from -40% in late May to about -5% June 1.
California, Florida and Texas, all states with a strong legal industry presence and still-rising COVID-19 cases, hit an average decline of -35% in new matters in early April before rebounding to about -15% June 1.
Newton noted that the rapid drop-off in business as well as its return to levels almost on par with pre-pandemic levels in New York was likely due to the state's more stringent containment strategy. States such as Texas and Florida, which used less drastic measures, saw less of a decline in business but also a slower, less impactful recovery than the Empire State.
"Texas and Florida could be in for a longer-term period of moderate economic pain," he said.
Corporate work has been less affected by the pandemic than other areas such as personal injury and criminal services, potentially due to the many court systems operating at reduced capacity, the survey found.
Compared to a baseline Jan. 6 of this year, work involving insurance, commercial goods and construction is actually up since the beginning of the year as of June 1, the survey found. Intellectual property and business-related work is down slightly over that same time period.
Newton said the technology adoption rate was one of the more interesting elements of the survey. The survey found that 74% of the respondents said legal professionals were equipped to handle electronic documents and e-signatures, 77% were equipped to handle video conferencing, and 85% are using videoconferencing more than before the pandemic.
When asked about the 7% who said they were using video conferencing the same or less than before the pandemic, Newton said it was most likely due to individuals already using video a great deal, and not an actual drop-off in usage.
The overall use and adoption rate of tech in the legal sector was impressive, Newton said.
"COVID-19 has taken a decade of technology transformation in the legal industry and condensed it into a couple of months," Newton said. "If you would have shown me these survey results and asked me what year it was, I would have said 2030."
Among the survey's more worrisome findings: Compared to early April, when 23% of respondents thought the economic impacts of COVID-19 would subside within three months, the latest outlook is more dire. Only 16% of respondents thought the same by the end of May.
Legal professionals' take on layoffs has also shifted. In early April, 11% of responding firms had laid off staff and 22% of respondents anticipated layoffs. In late May, 27% of firms had laid off staff and 29% expected layoffs.
Read More
Are Bank Practices Finally Seeing a Rebound Amid the Pandemic Response?
For Law Firms, 'Seeing Is Believing' on Work-From-Home Viability
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Arizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250