What's Next: Where Will Self-Driving Vehicles Take Us in the Next Pandemic? + California Delivers Latest Blow to Gig Economy + Are Oculus VR and Palmer Luckey Headed to Trial?
If autonomous vehicles could hit the road during the next health crisis, daily life during a pandemic could look much different.
June 17, 2020 at 07:30 AM
8 minute read
Welcome back for another week of What's Next, where we report on the intersection of law and technology. Here's what we've got for you today:
>> What could the next pandemic look like with autonomous vehicles?
>> The San Francisco district attorney predicts more worker misclassification actions against gig economy.
>> Oculus VR and Palmer Lucky could be headed to trial.
Let's chat: Email me at [email protected] and follow me on Twitter at @a_lancaster.
Hailing Autonomous Vehicles for the Next Pandemic
Testing for autonomous vehicles, especially in Silicon Valley, has largely ground to a halt amid the pandemic, said John McNelis, partner and co-chair of the autonomous transportation and shared mobility practice at Fenwick & West in Mountain View, California. For some companies, the tests are a two-person job, and for others, continuing to test could pile onto overloaded health care workers in the event of an accident.
But if autonomous vehicles could hit the road during the next global health crisis, daily life during a pandemic could look much different.
For example, a transit system of autonomous vehicles could mean fewer essential workers have to take public transit during a pandemic.
"A lot of our essential workers take mass transit everyday," McNelis said. "That's a problem when you're trying to social distance. Having a full fleet of autonomous vehicles that could transport essential workers to hospitals and grocers will be what will happen if the next pandemic occurs after autonomous vehicles have been widely adopted."
Self-driving vehicles could also transport groceries to elderly and at-risk groups and shuttle patients to and from the doctor, he said.
The vehicles could help get employees back to work sooner, as well, without fear of having to take public transit during the commute. For many people, this has been a traumatic experience, McNelis said.
"There's a question with no known answer of how people are going to react when this is over," he said.
SPONSORED BY ALM PARTNERS
Microsoft Excel – Quick Reference Guide
This Microsoft Excel Reference provides shortcuts, tips, and tricks for the spreadsheet software. Use this reference to brush up on the basics and to find alternative methods to your favorite commands. This printable quick reference is yours to use, distribute, and share at your organization! READ MORE
Gig Economy Under Fire
Third-party delivery company DoorDash is the latest gig economy operation that California officials have targeted for classifying workers as contractors instead of employees.
On Tuesday, San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin announced a lawsuit against DoorDash, The Recorder's Ross Todd reported. Boudin said the SF DA's office will be seeking a court order enjoining the company to designate couriers as employees.
"It shouldn't require that. It shouldn't be necessary. But sadly we know that it is," Boudin said in a press conference announcing the lawsuit.
Gig companies' reliance on independent contractors puts the businesses on precarious footing in the state. After a decision last week, the California Public Utilities Commission now considers Lyft and Uber drivers to be employees, under the ABC test created by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court and codified in California's Assembly Bill 5.
The action also follows a similar complaint filed against Uber and Lyft by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and city attorneys in San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego. In that suit, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is defending Uber, while Lyft tapped Keker, Van Nest & Peters, two law firms that have repped the companies in misclassification suits in the past.
Boudin said he anticipates more misclassification actions against gig economy companies, noting that his office's lawsuit against DoorDash is the "first of many."
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2020/06/unnamed-2-2.jpg)
A New Reality for the Oculus VR Case
Oculus VR and its founder Palmer Luckey are likely headed to court over allegations the company is formed around stolen tech, after a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
It's been a long road for Oculus and Total Recall Technologies, which filed the suit against the VR company in 2015. Total Recall Technologies, a partnership between inventors Ron Igra and Thomas Seidl aimed at developing a 3D immersive reality headset, alleged that they entered a contract with Luckey to commercialize a VR headset. But Total Recall Technologies claims Luckey passed off the Oculus Rift as his own design, formed the Oculus VR company and sold it to Facebook, breaching their contract.
In its second appeal to the Ninth Circuit, Total Recall Technologies asked the court to reverse a summary judgement order that found it did not have the authority to sue, since Igra brought the suit without Seidl's sign-off, in violation of a partnership agreement.
In an unpublished memo decision, the Ninth Circuit found that Total Recall Technologies solved the authority problem by removing Seidl from the partnership.
"The district court abused its discretion by requiring Thomas Seidl to consent to the action as a condition of ratification," wrote Ninth Circuit Judges J. Clifford Wallace and Marsha Berzon and U.S. District Judge Terrence Berg of the Eastern District of Michigan sitting by designation. "By imposing that condition, the district court compelled Total Recall to keep its same structure and ownership to continue prosecuting the action."
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's Robert Stone and Brian Cannon represented Total Recall Technologies in the appeal. Cooley and Mayer Brown defended Luckey and Oculus.
Cannon said his team sees trial as the next step in the five-year long case. It's really an underdog story, he said.
"This is a situation of a Facebook subsidiary being built on the ideas and designs of another," he said. "Our clients are entrepreneurs and inventors, but they are obviously not as big as Facebook. So our clients are seeking to go against the biggest player in the field, to some degree, and we've really had to fight to make this happen."
On the Radar
'We Have to Demand More': Kirkland Palo Alto Associate Speaks Out About Race and Big Law "Anyone with a basic knowledge of the social, cultural, and historical context of the United States and the nature of human psychology can quickly understand how a junior black associate verbalizing concerns and offering valid criticisms (even asking pointed questions) can lead to undesirable outcomes for said black associate," wrote Kirkland & Ellis associate Lauren Skerrett. "There's no safe and polite way for the black junior associate to express frustrations to white leadership." Read more from Vivia Chen here.
Lex Machina Releases App to Track COVID-19′s Litigation Impact For further insights, COVID app users can view how many trials, judgment rulings and complaints mention COVID-19. All of the described elements are available to the public and current Legal Analytics customers for free, said Carla Rydhom, Lex Machina director of product management. Read more from Victoria Hudgins here.
German Publishers Drop Suit Against Google Over News Article Snippets "VG Media asserts rights. If Google accepts the claim, we will enter into a license agreement on reasonable terms. If Google denies our claims and does not negotiate, we will sue," a VG Media spokesman said. Read more from Eva von Schaper here.
LegalZoom Lures Away The Honest Company's General Counsel "The LegalZoom mission is really consistent with a core passion of mine. This democratization of law, driving of transparency, making the complex more simple is something that's consistent with my core value system and it's something that drives me," said Nicole Miller, the newly appointed general counsel of LegalZoom. Read more from Phillip Bantz here.
Thanks for reading. We will be back next week with more What's Next. Stay safe and healthy, everyone.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![What's Next: Felony Theft Over Settlements? | Malpractice Claims Soar What's Next: Felony Theft Over Settlements? | Malpractice Claims Soar](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/04/Handicapped-Puzzle-767x633.jpg)
![What's Next: Judge to Quash Twitter Subpoena | SCOTUS Won't Review Trial Ban What's Next: Judge to Quash Twitter Subpoena | SCOTUS Won't Review Trial Ban](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/05/Twitter-767x633-2.jpg)
What's Next: Judge to Quash Twitter Subpoena | SCOTUS Won't Review Trial Ban
4 minute read![What's Next: Speedy Trial Act Before SCOTUS | SG's Unusual New Amicus What's Next: Speedy Trial Act Before SCOTUS | SG's Unusual New Amicus](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/05/Jury-Box-1-767.jpg)
![What's Next: Zoombombing Settlement | Serial ADA Fallout What's Next: Zoombombing Settlement | Serial ADA Fallout](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/04/Zoom-headquarters-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 2Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
- 3Your Communications Are Not Secure! What Legal Professionals Need to Know
- 4Legal Leaders Need To Create A High-Trust Culture
- 5There's a New Chief Judge in Town: Meet the Top Miami Jurist
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250