COVID-19 Proved Associates Can Work Remotely, but Will Partners Ignore the Success?
Associates say COVID-19 shows they can maintain productively and quality when working remotely. But the traditional mindset and setup of law firms may curtail any flexibility gained during the pandemic.
June 22, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
If COVID-19 has shown anything, it's that law firms can work remotely for a significant length of time. And at least one group of attorneys is looking to keep that momentum going post-coronavirus.
Associates hoping to leverage remote working arrangements in the future say the fact that productivity and work product quality were maintained during the pandemic's shelter-in-place mandates is evidence against arguments that in-person work is superior.
"It's funny because I would consider myself someone that hates working from home. Before this [COVID-19], I would never choose to work remotely," said Ahmad Zaffarese labor and employment associate Aleena Sorathia. "This has shown me I can be productive in my own space and perhaps take advantage of that flexibility."
The sustained productivity hasn't been missed by associates' superiors either, including those previously skeptical of remote working.
"I think people have realized we can be as productive working from home and still meet our billables and communicate with our clients as we are fully remote," said Reed Smith associate Leidy Gutierrez.
Indeed, Loeb Leadership's recent "The Legal Industry's Handling of the Disruption Caused by COVID-19″ report found support for remote working is growing. More than half (66%) of the 25 firms contacted wanted to continue working remotely, if only for a few days a week, post-coronavirus. Of associate respondents, 100% said they wanted to continue working remotely, if only partially.
Some associates even want to leverage remote working arrangements in lieu of using vacation, family leave and other scheduled days off to balance the firm's need to bill hours and the associate's personal demands.
"For certain employees in certain positions, deciding to take time off or whatever the matter is, employers may have a little more room to accommodate a work from home plan with them," said Keefe Law Firm associate and Camden County, New Jersey, Bar Association Young Lawyers Committee chair Christopher Keating. "Everything is on the table for some employers."
Still, some associates say remote working arrangements can lead to missing out on casual, but important, moments to impress partners.
Donovan Bonner, who started at Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass as an associate during COVID-19, noted that making introductions and building rapport is difficult when working remotely and can negatively impact an associate's path to partnership. "I think that physical interaction and casualness helps, and you get more work from that," he said.
Despite the industry's sudden shift to remotely working, some lawyers will still view in-person work more favorably, which younger attorneys should take into consideration, said Critton Luttier Coleman associate Santo DiGangi. "I do think it is beneficial for young attorneys to be in the office, especially when they work with older lawyers that don't understand technology as well," DiGangi noted.
"There's a culture established in them [firms] and it's harder to break," he added. "It will take pioneers to bring that change. It's possible, but I don't see it happening in the near future."
Others, however, are more optimistic. Los Angeles-based Harris Ginsberg associate Jack McMorrow sees lawyers' rigidness toward remote working softening after lawyers maintained productivity during a pandemic.
"Formality is an inescapable part of the initial character of an attorney, and over time the formality is decreasing," he said.
He added that reopening "will present the opportunity for law firms to see it [remote working] is not as bad as they think it it is. … Once the firms give up on that they might not force it back into existence after. I do think younger attorneys will want to take advantage of that."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250