Data Privacy: Where Are We Now? Plus, CCPA Updates and Impacts
[On-Demand] | Privacy remains one of the top issues for in-house counsel and law firms, and those issues underscoring the need for data privacy have become even more pronounced with the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic.
June 23, 2020 at 12:22 PM
4 minute read
ON-DEMAND ONLY
This event is now available on-demand. If you have previously registered for this event please click here and login using the email your registered with.
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
Privacy remains one of the top issues for in-house counsel and law firms, and those issues underscoring the need for data privacy have become even more pronounced with the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has generated numerous privacy, data protection, security and compliance questions. These challenges are driving the need for companies to ensure their platforms are not only secure, but forward looking.
How does the California Consumer Privacy Act play into this? Some companies have asked the attorney general to push back the enforcement date to January 1, 2021, citing complications caused by COVID-19. And some think the pandemic could be the impetus to finally get traction on a national data privacy law.
Businesses and legal departments may not have the data privacy spend to account for the impact that COVID-19 has had on employee data.
Join this webcast and learn the answers to these most asked questions:
- Where are we now? Get an update from the beginning of the year and a clear understanding of the biggest risks, and how to anticipate and successfully manage potential issues when they arise.
- What is the latest on the CCPA? What are some updates to the regulations that are in progress? What is not addressed that is a concern?
- What are some tools and strategies to help manage data privacy within your organization or law firm?
We'll also be addressing the recent Privacy Shield Decision and its potential impact.
REGISTER NOW! (Not able to attend? STILL REGISTER you will receive an email with how to access the recording of the event)
Speakers:
Michelle Hon Donovan | Partner | Duane Morris LLP Michelle Hon Donovan is a partner at Duane Morris, LLP. Ms. Donovan's practice is largely focused on in technology law, including the complex areas of privacy and information security. Ms. Donovan counsels clients on the rapidly changing field of data privacy, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and other state and federal privacy laws. Ms. Donovan provides privacy advice to clients a wide range of industries, including pharmaceutical and biotechnology, consumer electronics, software, e-commerce, automotive, real estate management and development, education, staffing, cannabis, and social networking. | |
Mark Brennan | Global Lead Innovation Partner | Hogan Lovells US LLP Based out of D.C., Mark leads an integrated technology practice that spans privacy, communications, and consumer protection issues. His clients include leading online and e-commerce companies, global telecommunications providers, Internet of Things pioneers and app developers, and other clients from the financial services, retail, transportation, education, and healthcare sectors. He advises on connected devices, artificial intelligence, cloud offerings, tech policy, and other cutting-edge challenges and is well-known for his work on Telephone Consumer Protection Act issues. Mark also co-chairs the firm's Pride+ global LGBT+ ally network. | |
Chad Perlov | Lexis Practice Advisor Content Manager | LexisNexis Chad Perlov is a Content Manager for Lexis Practice Advisor and is responsible for the development of practical guidance and legal know-how in the areas of privacy and data security, technology transactions, e-commerce, and IP/IT in corporate transactions. In his legal career, Chad served as general counsel for a leading software development and IT solutions company, an attorney at large law firms in New York and Sydney, and in- house counsel at a prominent consumer products company. Chad earned his BA from the University of Kansas and his JD from the University of Colorado School of Law, where he was a member of the Colorado Law Review and a research assistant. He is CIPP/US certified and admitted to practice in New York, Colorado, and Australia. |
or call at (212) 457-4981
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250