More Firms Seek Austerity Amid Lasting Concerns of Pandemic's Impact
Holland & Hart, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Fried Frank are the latest firms looking to reduce personnel costs, via a combination of voluntary buyouts and mandatory pay cuts.
June 24, 2020 at 07:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The sky may not be falling for U.S. law firms, but more than three months after nationwide coronavirus shutdowns brought the American economy to its knees, several firms are continuing to enact austerity measures, with Holland & Hart, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson recently joining the list.
A recent survey from Wells Fargo Private Bank found that a strong start to 2020 helped limit the slippage in demand to just a 1.4% drop for the first five months of the year. Nonetheless, the measures taken by these firms seems to validate Wells Fargo senior director of sales Joe Mendola's conclusion that the impacts of dampened demand will become more immediate in the coming months.
Stroock's response, from the beginning of June, includes both compensation reductions for all attorneys and many staff as well as optional buyouts for employees. Fried Frank is also offering buyouts for staff. And Holland & Hart also implemented compensation cuts at the start of this month.
The Denver-based firm had seen head count dip in recent years before stabilizing at just over 400 in 2019. And revenues ticked upward by 3.1% in the last year, resulting in what a spokesperson for the firm called "one of its strongest years." But even factoring in a robust first quarter, the firm elected to take preemptive measures to guard the firm's finances starting in June.
These include reductions to equity partner distributions that exceed the 15% cuts for all non-equity salaried attorneys. Staffers earning over $100,000 are subject to 7.5% cuts, while those earning over $60,000 are receiving 5% cuts. The firm may dial back these reductions at any point based on its financial performance, a firm spokeswoman said.
Stroock's mix of pay cuts and voluntary buyouts comes following a similar recent history. After several years of falling head count, the 2019 number was essentially flat at just below 250. And revenue grew by 2.8%.
From the start of June, equity partners saw draws reduced by 20% and all other lawyers took a 15% hit. Associates who hit hours targets will ultimately be "made whole," however. And employees who wish to retire early or avoid returning to the office when remote work ends will have the option of taking "generous" buyouts.
"We believe that the measures we have introduced are fair, and we have used the preceding three months to take a mindful approach to ways in which we can responsibly navigate the current economic challenges," a spokesperson for the firm said earlier this month.
Fried Frank had a stellar 2019, standing out amid its elite New York peers with a 13.3% increase in revenues and a 16% increase in profits per equity partner. The firm boasted in April that it wasn't cutting pay and it was providing a technology stipend so its attorneys could work from home better.
It's still not engaging in any mandatory measures, and attorneys are untouched, a spokeswoman confirmed. But staffers will be able to avail themselves of buyouts. Those who opt in will receive one week of salary for every year of service at the firm, capped at 24 weeks, plus $1,000 for each year.
That's a sign that even the healthiest of firms are thinking seriously of methods to reduce costs as the pandemic shows few signs of swiftly abating.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250