More Firms Seek Austerity Amid Lasting Concerns of Pandemic's Impact
Holland & Hart, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Fried Frank are the latest firms looking to reduce personnel costs, via a combination of voluntary buyouts and mandatory pay cuts.
June 24, 2020 at 07:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The sky may not be falling for U.S. law firms, but more than three months after nationwide coronavirus shutdowns brought the American economy to its knees, several firms are continuing to enact austerity measures, with Holland & Hart, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson recently joining the list.
A recent survey from Wells Fargo Private Bank found that a strong start to 2020 helped limit the slippage in demand to just a 1.4% drop for the first five months of the year. Nonetheless, the measures taken by these firms seems to validate Wells Fargo senior director of sales Joe Mendola's conclusion that the impacts of dampened demand will become more immediate in the coming months.
Stroock's response, from the beginning of June, includes both compensation reductions for all attorneys and many staff as well as optional buyouts for employees. Fried Frank is also offering buyouts for staff. And Holland & Hart also implemented compensation cuts at the start of this month.
The Denver-based firm had seen head count dip in recent years before stabilizing at just over 400 in 2019. And revenues ticked upward by 3.1% in the last year, resulting in what a spokesperson for the firm called "one of its strongest years." But even factoring in a robust first quarter, the firm elected to take preemptive measures to guard the firm's finances starting in June.
These include reductions to equity partner distributions that exceed the 15% cuts for all non-equity salaried attorneys. Staffers earning over $100,000 are subject to 7.5% cuts, while those earning over $60,000 are receiving 5% cuts. The firm may dial back these reductions at any point based on its financial performance, a firm spokeswoman said.
Stroock's mix of pay cuts and voluntary buyouts comes following a similar recent history. After several years of falling head count, the 2019 number was essentially flat at just below 250. And revenue grew by 2.8%.
From the start of June, equity partners saw draws reduced by 20% and all other lawyers took a 15% hit. Associates who hit hours targets will ultimately be "made whole," however. And employees who wish to retire early or avoid returning to the office when remote work ends will have the option of taking "generous" buyouts.
"We believe that the measures we have introduced are fair, and we have used the preceding three months to take a mindful approach to ways in which we can responsibly navigate the current economic challenges," a spokesperson for the firm said earlier this month.
Fried Frank had a stellar 2019, standing out amid its elite New York peers with a 13.3% increase in revenues and a 16% increase in profits per equity partner. The firm boasted in April that it wasn't cutting pay and it was providing a technology stipend so its attorneys could work from home better.
It's still not engaging in any mandatory measures, and attorneys are untouched, a spokeswoman confirmed. But staffers will be able to avail themselves of buyouts. Those who opt in will receive one week of salary for every year of service at the firm, capped at 24 weeks, plus $1,000 for each year.
That's a sign that even the healthiest of firms are thinking seriously of methods to reduce costs as the pandemic shows few signs of swiftly abating.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWas It Ever A Profession? A Look at the History of Law Firms as a Business with RJon Robins
1 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readLaw Firm Sued for Telemarketing Calls to Customers on Do Not Call Registry
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250