Coronavirus Cuts Keep Coming; DOJ vs. ACA; Conversing About COVID-19 and Courts: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
June 25, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CORONAVIRUS CUTS CONTINUE – A recent survey from Wells Fargo Private Bank found that a strong start to 2020 helped soften the blow for many law firms when COVID-19 began to crush legal demand. But even as economies begin to reopen, the legal industry still has a long road out of the woods, as evidenced by continued cost-cutting measures by several firms, including, most recently, Holland & Hart, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Fried Frank. Dan Packel reports that, since the beginning of June, those firms have implemented compensation cuts and/or staff buyouts, signaling that even healthy firms remain cautious as the pandemic lingers.
URGENT CARE - The DOJ faces a deadline today to file its opening brief with SCOTUS in the Affordable Care Act case California v. Texas. The Trump Justice Department has argued in support of repealing the entirety of the signature Obama-era health care law. The Texas trial judge's 2018 ruling declaring the ACA unlawful garnered rave reviews from a number of court watchers, who called it "embarrassingly bad" and "unmoored." But a divided Fifth Circuit panel largely affirmed the decision last December, finding that the ACA's individual mandate to purchase health insurance is unconstitutional. A coalition of Democratic-led states appealed and the justices are likely to hear the dispute later this fall in the new term, perhaps shortly before the 2020 presidential election.
COVID'S CONSEQUENCES FOR COURTS - The U.S. House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet is set to hold a hearing titled, "Federal Courts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Best Practices, Opportunities for Innovation, and Lessons for the Future." Not the snappiest name but it certainly lets you know right up front what you're in for. Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Bridget McCormack, Senior U.S. Judge for the District of Arizona David Campbell, Berkeley Judicial Institute executive director Jeremy Fogel and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press policy analyst Melissa Wasser are set to testify.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'Appellate Project' Aims to Boost Diversity in Specialized Bar
Judge Orders McDonald's to Improve COVID-19 Protections
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
FACELIFT - Facebook will need to overhaul its business model in Germany after the country's highest court ruled that the social media giant abused its dominant position to collect and pool user data, Eva von Schaper reports. The decision means Facebook must now give German users the choice of how the company can use data it collects from its own platform and from its WhatsApp and Instagram sites, as well as information gathered from third parties.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
|"The members of this panel have enjoyed long careers in the practice of law. We've seen enough to make it difficult to shock us. But not, as it turns out, impossible."
|— William Bedsworth , acting presiding justice of California's Fourth District Court of Appeal, reversing a trial court's "unreasonable" decision to lower a third-strike defendant's sentence to five years for a hate crime against a Black pregnant woman at a Fullerton, California, bus station.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
6 minute readSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Be Comfortable Being Uncomfortable': Pearls of Wisdom From 2024 GC Q&As
- 2The New Frontier in Legal Compliance: Privacy, Security, and Information Governance for Law Firms
- 3North Carolina Courts Switch to Digital, Face Extreme Weather in 2024
- 4It’s Happening Faster than Anyone Thought
- 5Mootness and Ethics: Meeting the Client’s Objectives
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250