Dallas Attorney Says He's Recruited Thousands of Lawyers to Help Joe Biden Become the Next US President
Dallas attorney Marc Stanley, always an avid Democratic political supporter, is recruiting lawyers to donate money and legal services to help elect presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden as U.S. president.
June 25, 2020 at 01:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Dallas attorney Marc Stanley says he's recruited thousands of lawyers from across the U.S. to donate time and to volunteer legal services to Joe Biden's campaign for president of the United States.
The Biden campaign named Stanley, founder and principal in The Stanley Law Group, as chairman of the "Lawyers for Biden" arm of the campaign.
"I was asked to chair this by Joe Biden," Stanley said.
Texas Lawyer talked with Stanley, who was a major contributor and fundraiser to the Democratic presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, about his role and what Lawyers for Biden seeks to accomplish. Here are his answers, edited for brevity and clarity.
No one from the Biden nor the President Donald Trump campaign responded to an email seeking comment.
|Texas Lawyer: What is "Lawyers for Biden"?
Marc Stanley: Lawyers for Biden is a finance committee, but it's also a national network of leaders and advocates who share Joe Biden's vision for restoring the soul of America and the rule of law, and are committed to mobilizing the resources and ideas of the legal community for Joe Biden's campaign.
|Who are the lawyers in the group?
It's a huge umbrella: We have big firm lawyers, small firm lawyers, sole practitioners, law professors, in-house counsel, plaintiffs lawyers, defense lawyers. Everybody is welcome.
We're hearing from a lot of former U.S. attorneys, assistant U.S. attorneys, and former justice department lawyers who are very eager to help us replace Trump and elect Joe Biden.
We have them from every state, I'm proud to say. The response has been incredible.
When you say the group is "mobilizing resources," do you mean campaign contributions?
Everything from campaign contributions to using legal talent. We've had lawyers work on voter protection already in the primaries. We've had lawyers perform due diligence for the campaign. We've had lawyers even review contracts. We've had lawyers—like me—walk the streets canvassing in various states.
I think lawyers have a particular interest in this campaign because of the threats that we've seen to the rule of law. President Trump has appointed truly activist, ultra-conservative judges to the federal benches. He's used the justice department as his own personal law firm. He's criticized the judiciary when they've disagreed with him. I think the lawyers I've talked to have had enough of it.
|How do the group members get their pro bono legal assignments?
I would imagine the campaign does hire some outside counsel for certain things, but the Lawyers for Biden members who volunteer for the campaign do that without compensation.
They are contacted by the campaign as needed and various arms of the campaign. Whether it's canvassing or doing due diligence or vetting or legal research, when folks need help, they will contact people. We have a database, and eventually, I hope everyone who wants to be deployed, will be deployed.
I anticipate there will be a lot of challenges in a lot of states, especially with what's going on with COVID-19, with absentee voting, with vote by mail, with efforts to purge voters and otherwise suppress the vote.
|Compared with your past activism for Democratic presidents, is there anything special or unique to you about this time around?
I can't think of anything more important than electing Joe Biden and replacing President Trump. If Trump gets another appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, and appoints a 40-year-old, we could lose that court for a generation. All the successes that we've seen for civil rights and social justice in the last 40 years could literally evaporate. I don't want to turn back the clock.
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readJudicial Appointments After Casey: Observers Wary but Hopeful Bipartisan Spirit Will Continue
Will Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250