EU Nearing Agreement on Rules for Consumer Class Actions
The new rules, if approved by European lawmakers, would smooth the way for consumers to file collective lawsuits over mass torts.
June 25, 2020 at 04:51 PM
3 minute read
The EU has taken a big step toward making it easier for consumers to file class action-type lawsuits across the European Union.
Negotiators from the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, which represents the 27 national governments, agreed this week on new EU-wide rules that, if approved by lawmakers, would smooth the way for consumers to file collective lawsuits over mass torts.
The new Representative Action Directive takes in "areas such as data protection, financial services, travel and tourism, energy, telecommunications, environment and health, as well as air and train passenger rights, in addition to general consumer law," according to a statement from the European Parliament.
Although European institutions have been discussing rules for consumer protection lawsuits for years, the rules approved Monday sprang from efforts launched in 2018 after the Volkswagen "Dieselgate" emissions scandal in 2015, where United States-based consumers could sue collectively for damages while European consumers could not.
The new rules deliberately stop short of authorizing U.S.-style class actions, setting limits on who can bring collective lawsuits and incorporating a "loser pays" principle designed to lower the financial barrier for consumers and discourage abusive or frivolous lawsuits.
"We have sought to strike a balance between the legitimate protection of consumer interests and the need for legal certainty for businesses," Geoffroy Didier, a French member of the European Parliament and member of the Committee on Legal Affairs, which help draft the new directive, said in a statement after the agreement was announced.
In an earlier statement, Didier said a goal in drafting the rules was to ensure that "all dangers and failures inherent in American class action are avoided."
The new rules apply and harmonize redress mechanisms across member states so that consumers in multiple jurisdictions can join in one action. Currently, 19 member states have laws that allow for collective redress by consumers, and the rules vary widely from country to country.
Under the new rules, each member state would nominate at least one qualified entity—an organization or a public body—to bring collective actions. These entities would have to comply with compatible criteria in all countries, such as being not-for-profit and having no financial agreements with third parties, including law firms, according to the new rules.
The new rules also require the European Commission to assess within three years if a European ombudsman for collective redress should be established.
The directive now goes to the full European Parliament and the full Council for approval. Member states will have 24 months to enact the approved directive into national law, and an additional six months to apply it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute read'We're Back': Fourth Circuit Considers Certification of Marriott Data Breach Class ... Again
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250