Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry Sides With Exoneree in Fight for Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation
"The governor recoiled at the prosecutorial misconduct that deprived [Alfred Dewayne Brown] and his lawyers of the exculpatory evidence that would ultimately set him free," said an amicus letter by former Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
June 26, 2020 at 03:34 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry is urging the Texas Supreme Court to side with a wrongfully convicted man who's fighting top Republican leaders over state compensation for his wrongful imprisonment.
In an amicus letter filed Thursday, Perry, who resigned last fall as U.S. energy secretary, gave his opinion on the case of Alfred Dewayne Brown, who appealed to the Supreme Court after the Texas Office of the Comptroller denied his request for compensation for the 12 years he spent on death row.
Read more: The Persecution of Alfred Brown: Texas AG, Police Conspired to Punish Innocent Man
Perry's letter, written by Austin attorney Bill Jones, said that while he was Texas governor for 15 years, Perry's reputation was tough on crime. But that does not extend to "tolerating instances of unjust imprisonment," said the letter.
Perry signed the Tim Cole Act, the Texas law that provides for state compensation for people who were wrongly convicted and imprisoned.
Brown, who was falsely accused of murdering a Houston police officer, but declared innocent in 2019, is seeking compensation under that law. The comptroller denied that request, casting doubt on the legal process that Brown followed to reach his actual innocence finding.
Read more: Houston Lawyer Fighting Denial of Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation for Innocent Client
"Gov. Perry has followed Dewayne Brown's turmoil ever since Brown was released from prison in 2015. The governor recoiled at the prosecutorial misconduct that deprived Brown and his lawyers of the exculpatory evidence that would ultimately set him free," the letter said.
Dan Rizzo, the prosecutor in Brown's case, is facing an attorney discipline lawsuit for allegedly withholding exculpatory evidence. Rizzo has denied the allegations and claimed he never saw the evidence in question.
Read more: Houston Ex-Prosecutor Faces Discipline for Allegedly Withholding Evidence in Alfred Dewayne Brown Case
Perry's letter said Brown is a classic example of why the state passed the Tim Cole Act. He deserves compensation, it said.
"Brown has been denied compensation based on the comptroller's second-guessing of a criminal judge's exercise of jurisdiction. This is not how the act the governor signed was designed to operate," said the letter.
The courts have the power to declare actual innocence, and here, both the prosecutor's office and a criminal court did that. An executive official shouldn't be allowed to override the innocence declaration, the letter said.
It added, "No amount of money can restore the years of liberty Brown has lost. But compensation can provide one small measure of redress for a man who bore the brunt of a wrongful conviction."
Perry's attorney, Bill Jones of The Jones Firm, didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment.
Comptroller spokesman Kevin Lyons declined comment. Kayleigh Date, spokeswoman for the Texas Office of the Attorney General, which represents the comptroller's office in Brown's appeal, declined comment.
Susman Godfrey partner Neal Manne, who represents Brown pro bono, said he knew about a speech Perry gave a business group four years ago in which the ex-governor discussed Brown's case.
"We were delighted that Gov. Perry felt strongly enough about the issue and the justice of Mr. Brown's position that he was willing to communicate his views to the Texas Supreme Court," Manne said.
All of the high court justices know Perry, who wrote the letter as the then-governor who signed the Tim Cole Act, he said.
"My hope is that the court will give appropriate consideration to Gov. Perry's strong statement that the comptroller is not following the requirements of the Tim Cole Act here," Manne said. "It should have covered and does cover a case like Mr. Brown's."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute readFree Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
3 minute readFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute readIndian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 2PayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
- 3Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
- 4NY Inspector General Announces Attorneys Hired to Lead Upstate Region and Gaming
- 5Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250